rebuttal

Generate venue-compliant rebuttal drafts from paper, reviews, and guidelines.

Updated Mar 1, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/hve4638/hve-cc-marketplace --skill rebuttal-hve4638
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: rebuttal
Source: https://github.com/hve4638/hve-cc-marketplace/tree/main/aris/skills/rebuttal
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/hve4638/hve-cc-marketplace --skill rebuttal-hve4638

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Drafting high-quality rebuttals across multiple reviewer rounds is time-consuming and error-prone. This skill provides a structured, evidence-based workflow to produce grounded, venue-compliant responses while maintaining provenance and safety.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Automated rebuttal drafting with per-reviewer responses, supporting multiple rounds.
  • Safety and governance by enforcing provenance, commitments, and coverage gates.
  • Use Case: Researchers preparing ICML/NeurIPS submissions can generate initial draft replies and track reviewer concerns.

Quick Start

Provide your paper, raw reviews, and venue guidelines to generate the initial rebuttal draft.

Frequently Asked Questions about rebuttal

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I write a venue-compliant academic rebuttal for multiple reviewers?

To write a venue-compliant academic rebuttal, you provide your paper, raw reviews, and venue guidelines to generate an initial draft with per-reviewer responses across multiple rounds.

Can I generate evidence-based rebuttals for ICML or NeurIPS submissions?

Yes, you can generate evidence-based rebuttals for ICML or NeurIPS submissions by applying the automated drafting workflow designed specifically for multi-reviewer conferences under strict venue rules.

How does provenance ensure my conference rebuttal claims are sourced?

Provenance ensures your conference rebuttal claims are sourced by enforcing strict safety constraints that require every claim to be tracked, verified, and approved through commitment and coverage gates.

What do I need to provide to draft an academic rebuttal with this workflow?

To draft an academic rebuttal with this workflow, you need to provide your original paper, the raw reviews from the reviewers, and the specific venue guidelines for the conference.

How do I track reviewer concerns during the rebuttal drafting process?

You track reviewer concerns during the rebuttal drafting process by using the automated workflow to generate per-reviewer responses and map coverage gates to ensure every constraint is addressed.

What are the limitations of automated rebuttal drafting for academic reviews?

A limitation of automated rebuttal drafting is that it requires strict adherence to venue guidelines and relies on complete provenance, meaning unsourced claims cannot bypass the enforced safety and commitment gates.