What problem does it solve?
Rebuttal writing after external reviews is time-consuming and risky because it must address every concern using only grounded, provenance-traceable evidence while staying within strict venue character limits.
Core Features & Use Cases
- Review parsing and normalization: Loads and records raw reviewer feedback verbatim, then atomizes concerns into an issue board with reviewer, round, severity, and anchors.
- Coverage-checked rebuttal planning: Produces a strategy plan that allocates a character budget, selects a response mode per issue, and blocks unsupported claims before drafting.
- Grounded rebuttal drafting for text-only venues: Generates a strict paste-ready rebuttal plus an optional richer draft while enforcing provenance, commitment approvals, and full issue coverage.
- Follow-up round support: Tracks new reviewer comments in a log and drafts delta replies with renewed safety validations.
Quick Start
Use the rebuttal skill to prepare an ICML-style text-only response to external reviews by providing your paper path or review bundle and asking for character-limited rebuttal output.