What problem does it solve?
Producing a strong post-submission rebuttal that accurately covers each reviewer’s concerns without inventing evidence and while staying within venue constraints.
Core Features & Use Cases
- Grounded rebuttal drafting: Parses external reviews, atomizes concerns into actionable issue cards, and produces a text-only rebuttal that matches the specified venue limit.
- Coverage and safety enforcement: Applies provenance, commitment, and coverage gates so every factual claim is sourced and every reviewer concern is either answered, deferred intentionally, or marked for user input.
- Single-document or per-reviewer thread outputs: Supports ICML-style shared rebuttals and OpenReview-style per-reviewer responses, with optional stress-testing for risky phrasing and promises.
- Follow-up rounds management: Maintains state and an auditable revision plan across initial and subsequent rebuttal iterations.
Quick Start
Use the rebuttal workflow to generate a venue-compliant rebuttal by providing your paper path and the raw reviewer bundle, then specify the venue and character limit as part of the request.