rebuttal

Parse external reviews into an issue board and draft venue-compliant rebuttals.

Updated Apr 1, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/Wenwen555/ARIS-LVLM --skill rebuttal-wenwen555
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: rebuttal
Source: https://github.com/Wenwen555/ARIS-LVLM/tree/main/skills/rebuttal
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/Wenwen555/ARIS-LVLM --skill rebuttal-wenwen555

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill helps researchers manage external reviews by parsing, organizing, and drafting safe, venue-compliant rebuttals across multiple rounds, reducing manual back-and-forth and ensuring coverage of reviewer concerns.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Parse and normalize reviewer comments into an issue board for clear tracking.
  • Generate a strategy plan and allocate response effort across reviewers and rounds.
  • Draft initial rebuttal text that adheres to venue limits and safety constraints, with grounded evidence where possible.
  • Manage follow-up rounds, resubmissions, and risk mitigation without fabricating evidence.
  • Use case: facing multiple reviewers at a conference with strict character limits, produce a compliant opener and a plan for future rounds.

Quick Start

Provide the paper, raw reviews, and venue rules to generate the initial rebuttal draft.

Frequently Asked Questions about rebuttal

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I write a peer-review rebuttal for multiple reviewers with strict venue limits?

To write a peer-review rebuttal, provide your paper, raw reviews, and venue rules. The system parses comments into an issue board, allocates response efforts, and generates a venue-compliant draft with safe language and evidence-backed responses.

What is an issue board for academic rebuttal planning and how does it work?

An issue board for academic rebuttal planning normalizes parsed reviewer comments into clear tracking items. It organizes concerns by reviewer and round, enabling targeted strategy planning and evidence-grounded responses across multi-round peer-review workflows.

Can I use automated rebuttal drafting for OpenReview multi-round review workflows?

Yes, automated rebuttal drafting supports OpenReview multi-round workflows. It manages follow-up rounds, resubmissions, and risk mitigation by enforcing provenance, commitment, and coverage gates while generating venue-compliant drafts.

How do I ensure my academic rebuttal does not fabricate evidence when responding to reviewer concerns?

To ensure your academic rebuttal does not fabricate evidence, use a drafting system with provenance and grounding gates. It generates safe language and evidence-backed responses, mitigating risk without inventing unsupported claims during peer-review.

What is the best way to manage response effort allocation across multiple academic reviewers?

The best way to manage response effort allocation across academic reviewers is generating a strategy plan after parsing comments into an issue board. This approach distributes effort across reviewers and rounds to maintain venue compliance and coverage.

When do I need venue-compliant drafting for academic writing resubmissions?

You need venue-compliant drafting for academic writing resubmissions when facing multi-round peer-review workflows with strict character limits. It enforces coverage gates and safe language to manage reviewer concerns across follow-up rounds.