What problem does it solve?
This Skill eliminates the risk and effort of drafting academic paper rebuttals that fail to meet strict venue rules, miss critical reviewer concerns, or include unsubstantiated claims that can damage your submission's credibility.
Core Features & Use Cases
- Automated Review Parsing: Normalizes raw reviewer feedback into structured, trackable concern cards.
- Safety-First Drafting: Enforces provenance, commitment, and coverage gates to prevent fabrication, unapproved promises, or missed issues.
- Venue-Compliant Output: Supports both single-document shared responses and per-reviewer thread responses, with strict character limit enforcement for conferences like ICML, NeurIPS, and OpenReview venues.
- Follow-Up Round Management: Tracks new reviewer comments, drafts delta replies, and updates revision checklists for multi-round rebuttal processes.
- Use Case: A researcher submitting to MICCAI 2025 can use this Skill to parse 4 reviewer comments, prioritize critical concerns, draft a compliant 5000-character rebuttal, and run a stress test to catch unaddressed issues before submission.
Quick Start
Use the rebuttal skill to draft a compliant, safety-checked response to the external reviews for your submitted conference paper, following your venue's character limits and response format rules.