rebuttal

Organize reviewer feedback and draft venue-compliant rebuttals with evidence.

Updated Jul 2, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/SamyakJhaveri/loam --skill rebuttal-samyakjhaveri
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: rebuttal
Source: https://github.com/SamyakJhaveri/loam/tree/main/seed/_research/skills/rebuttal
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/SamyakJhaveri/loam --skill rebuttal-samyakjhaveri

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Manage external reviewer feedback and generate venue-compliant rebuttals with structured evidence, ensuring coverage and traceability across follow-up rounds.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Parses external reviews, enforces coverage and grounding, drafts a safe text-only rebuttal under venue limits, and manages follow-up rounds.
  • Supports multi-reviewer scenarios, evidence-backed drafting, and structured revision artifacts for later submission.
  • Useful for researchers preparing ICML/OpenReview responses and for teams coordinating response plans.

Quick Start

Provide your paper, raw reviews, and venue constraints to initialize the rebuttal workflow and generate an issue board and draft plan.

Frequently Asked Questions about rebuttal

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I write an ICML rebuttal that addresses multiple reviewer feedback points at scale?

To write an ICML rebuttal at scale, you can parse raw reviews to organize feedback, enforce coverage of each point, and draft a safe text-only response grounded in evidence. This ensures your rebuttal satisfies venue requirements for provenance and commitment.

What is the best way to manage OpenReview rebuttals with strict word limits?

The best way to manage OpenReview rebuttals with strict word limits is to use a workflow that parses external reviews, drafts a text-only response under venue constraints, and generates an issue board to track coverage and traceability across follow-up rounds.

How do I ground claims in evidence when drafting a paper rebuttal?

To ground claims in evidence when drafting a paper rebuttal, the system organizes reviewer feedback and enforces grounding by linking your responses to specific evidence. It creates structured artifacts that ensure provenance and coverage for multi-reviewer scenarios.

Can I plan follow-up revision rounds after submitting my initial OpenReview response?

Yes, you can plan follow-up revision rounds after submitting your initial OpenReview response. The workflow manages follow-up rounds by generating a comprehensive revision plan and structured artifacts for later submission based on the initial reviewer feedback.

Does this rebuttal workflow support text-only responses for multi-reviewer scenarios?

Yes, this rebuttal workflow supports text-only responses for multi-reviewer scenarios. It parses feedback from multiple reviewers, enforces coverage, and drafts a safe response under strict venue word limits while maintaining traceability through structured artifacts.

What do I need to provide to start generating a venue-compliant rebuttal?

To start generating a venue-compliant rebuttal, you need to provide your paper, raw external reviews, and venue constraints. The system uses these inputs to initialize the workflow and generate an issue board and draft plan.