rebuttal

Draft venue-compliant ICML rebuttals from reviews and manuscript.

1|Updated Mar 26, 2026

Search Tags:#safety #provenance #evidence #review-management #rebuttal #icml #openreview

Ready to run

npx skills add https://github.com/Lingrongye/federated-learning --skill rebuttal-lingrongye

💬 Prompt for ChatGPT / Claude Chat▼

Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: rebuttal
Source: https://github.com/Lingrongye/federated-learning/tree/main/Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep/skills/rebuttal
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/Lingrongye/federated-learning --skill rebuttal-lingrongye

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Drafting rigorous, venue-compliant rebuttals from external reviews is error-prone and time-consuming. This Skill provides an end-to-end workflow to organize reviews, identify core concerns, design responses with evidence, and ensure safety gates before submission.

Core Features & Use Cases

Automates normalization of reviewer feedback and creation of an issue board that maps each concern to a response strategy.
Builds a cohesive rebuttal plan, drafts per-reviewer responses, and enforces provenance, commitment, and coverage constraints.
Use Case: You have ICML reviewer feedback and need a bound, evidence-focused reply that adheres to character limits and multiple rounds.

Quick Start

Provide your paper, raw reviews, and venue rules to initialize the rebuttal workflow and generate the initial ISSUE_BOARD and STRATEGY_PLAN.

Frequently Asked Questions about rebuttal

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema

How do I draft an ICML rebuttal that adheres to strict character limits?▼

To draft an ICML rebuttal, provide your paper, raw reviews, and venue rules to generate a normalized issue board mapping reviewer concerns to response strategies while enforcing strict character limits.

Can I use automated rebuttal drafting for multiple reviewer rounds on OpenReview?▼

Yes, automated rebuttal drafting supports ICML-style text-only rebuttals with multiple reviewers and follow-up rounds by building a cohesive plan and tracking coverage across all interactions on OpenReview.

What is the best way to map external reviewer feedback to a response strategy?▼

The best way to map external reviewer feedback is to normalize the reviews into an issue board, identifying core concerns and designing responses with explicit evidence for any factual or strategic claims.

Does rebuttal drafting require explicit evidence for factual claims?▼

Yes, rebuttal drafting enforces provenance, commitment, and coverage gates, requiring explicit evidence before making any factual or strategic claims to ensure a rigorous and safe venue-compliant reply.

How do I ensure my venue rebuttal covers all reviewer concerns without missing issues?▼

Ensure your venue rebuttal covers all concerns by applying coverage gates that track each issue from the normalized feedback board through to the final per-reviewer drafted response.