rebuttal

Draft venue-compliant rebuttals for peer reviews with grounded evidence.

Updated Apr 18, 2026

Search Tags:#documentation #safety #provenance #peer-review #venue #rebuttal #icml

Ready to run

npx skills add https://github.com/THUFanZd/Sewed_pipeline --skill rebuttal-thufanzd

💬 Prompt for ChatGPT / Claude Chat▼

Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: rebuttal
Source: https://github.com/THUFanZd/Sewed_pipeline/tree/main/.agents/skills/rebuttal
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/THUFanZd/Sewed_pipeline --skill rebuttal-thufanzd

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Prepare precise, evidence-backed rebuttals that comply with venue rules and manage reviewer feedback across rounds.

Core Features & Use Cases

Grounded drafting: Produces venue-compliant rebuttals that reference reviewer concerns with traceable evidence.
Lifecycle tracking: Manages phases from intake to final submission, including follow-up rounds and state logs.
Safety and provenance: Enforces provenance, commitment, and coverage gates to prevent fabrication and overpromising.
Use Case: A researcher uses this workflow to organize ICML review responses, align with guidelines, and document decisions.

Quick Start

Draft a venue-compliant rebuttal that addresses the given reviews while respecting word and character limits.

Frequently Asked Questions about rebuttal

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema

How do I write a venue-compliant rebuttal for ICML peer reviews?▼

To write an ICML rebuttal, draft responses that directly address reviewer concerns with traceable evidence while respecting strict character limits. The workflow manages multiple reviewers, follow-up rounds, and enforces provenance to prevent fabrication and overpromising.

What is the best way to manage multiple reviewers during the rebuttal phase?▼

Managing multiple reviewers involves tracking each reviewer's specific concerns, logging progress from intake to final submission, and ensuring coverage gates are met. This structured lifecycle tracking prevents missing key feedback during follow-up rounds.

Can I use automated drafting for conference rebuttals without fabricating evidence?▼

Yes, you can draft rebuttals without fabrication by enforcing provenance gates that require traceable evidence for all claims. The workflow applies safety mechanisms to prevent overpromising and ensures all responses are grounded in the actual paper.

How do I handle strict character limits when responding to peer review feedback?▼

Handling strict character limits requires drafting concise responses that align with venue guidelines while covering all reviewer concerns. The workflow enforces these limits automatically and tracks coverage to ensure no critical feedback is ignored.

Does this workflow support follow-up rounds for external peer reviews?▼

Yes, the workflow supports follow-up rounds for external peer reviews by maintaining lifecycle state logs across phases. It tracks progress from initial intake through final submission, ensuring continuity across multiple reviewer interactions.