reg-gap-analysis

A compliance gap analysis diffs new regulatory requirements against your current AI governance posture, extracting citations and classifying gaps with remediation effort estimates. You provide the regulation name or pasted text, and the tool scopes applicability before generating a prioritized remediation plan.

Regulatory gap classification ranks compliance deficits by enforcement urgency, prohibited-practice risk, effort-to-impact ratio, and cross-use-case impact. This risk prioritization ensures high-risk AI governance gaps are remediated first, producing a dated markdown tracker of must-do and should-do actions.

To check if AI regulation guidance applies, the gap analysis process begins with scoping your current governance posture against the new requirements. It extracts substantive regulatory obligations with citations before comparing them to your existing state to determine exact applicability.

Yes, the gap analysis reads your current AI governance posture directly from your configured CLAUDE.md file. It uses this baseline to compare against new regulatory requirements, ensuring the resulting compliance remediation plan reflects your organization's actual governance state.

The best way to create a remediation tracker is to output a dated markdown plan categorizing gaps into must-do, should-do, compliant areas, and explicitly accepted gaps. This tracks compliance remediation by prioritizing actions based on enforcement urgency and prohibited-practice risk.