regulatory-returns

Generate de-identified HSE regulatory returns for OSHA, RIDDOR, and EU jurisdictions.

1|Updated Jun 14, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/ashley-eyekyam/hse-leadership-skills --skill regulatory-returns
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: regulatory-returns
Source: https://github.com/ashley-eyekyam/hse-leadership-skills/tree/main/skills/regulatory-returns
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/ashley-eyekyam/hse-leadership-skills --skill regulatory-returns

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes scripts (resource) and references (resource) and assets (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

Generic AI-generated safety paperwork is often vague, relies exclusively on low-order controls like PPE, lacks clear action owners, leaks personal health data, and is frequently rejected by regulators. This skill eliminates those failures by enforcing a structured intake process to capture all required incident and jurisdiction details, applying jurisdiction-specific recordability/reportability tests, mandating strict de-identification of sensitive data, and requiring domain-expert review before any output is delivered.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Jurisdiction-specific compliance testing: Applies the correct recordability/reportability criteria for US OSHA 29 CFR 1904 (Forms 300/300A/301), UK RIDDOR 2013, EU member-state equivalents, and routes India returns to the hse-india skill suite with mandatory state detection.
  • Mandatory de-identification: Scrubs all personal identifiers, health data, and small-cell aggregated data (fewer than 5 individuals) from circulated copies, with separate access-controlled storage for legally required named submissions and re-identification keys.
  • Structured intake guardrails: Refuses to provide a recordable/reportable yes/no answer until all required incident facts, jurisdiction, and return type details are captured, preventing guesswork and non-compliant determinations.
  • Use Case: A safety manager can use this skill to confirm if a first-aid-only workplace laceration is recordable on the OSHA 300 log, prepare a RIDDOR specified injury report with the correct 15-day filing deadline, or generate a de-identified 300A annual summary for their team without exposing employee identifiers.

Quick Start

Ask the regulatory-returns skill to determine if your recent workplace incident is recordable under OSHA 1904 or reportable under UK RIDDOR, and generate a de-identified statutory return with the correct form and exact filing deadline.

Frequently Asked Questions about regulatory-returns

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I generate a compliant RIDDOR specified injury report with the correct filing deadline?

To generate a compliant RIDDOR report, apply the RIDDOR 2013 reportability criteria to captured incident facts and identify the exact 15-day filing deadline. The process enforces strict de-identification and requires domain-expert review before delivering the statutory return.

What is the process for de-identifying an OSHA 300A annual summary?

De-identifying an OSHA 300A annual summary requires scrubbing all personal identifiers, health data, and small-cell aggregated data with fewer than 5 individuals. The process enforces this mandatory de-identification while maintaining separate access-controlled storage for legally required named submissions.

Does this regulatory returns skill support both US OSHA 1904 and EU member-state equivalents?

Yes, this regulatory returns skill supports US OSHA 29 CFR 1904 Forms 300/300A/301, UK RIDDOR 2013, and EU member-state equivalents. It applies jurisdiction-specific recordability and reportability tests to determine compliance and form requirements.

How do I determine if a workplace laceration is recordable on the OSHA 300 log?

To determine if a workplace laceration is recordable on the OSHA 300 log, the process applies OSHA 29 CFR 1904 recordability tests to captured incident facts. It refuses to provide a determination until all required incident details and jurisdiction information are captured.

What are the limitations of using AI for statutory reporting without structured intake guardrails?

Without structured intake guardrails, AI-generated statutory reporting is often vague, relies on low-order controls, and leaks personal health data. This skill prevents these failures by enforcing a structured intake process and requiring pre-output SME review and quality validation.

When do I need to route India state-level returns to the hse-india skill suite?

You need to route India state-level returns to the hse-india skill suite when generating regulatory returns for Indian jurisdictions. This skill mandates this routing with mandatory state detection to ensure accurate statutory reporting and compliance.