RenJW-Research

Route academic research requests across literature search, design, implementation, and review modules.

Updated Apr 17, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/RenJW418/RenJW-Research_skill --skill renjw-research
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: RenJW-Research
Source: https://github.com/RenJW418/RenJW-Research_skill/tree/main/RenJW-Research
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/RenJW418/RenJW-Research_skill --skill renjw-research

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill helps users go from vague research intentions to a structured end-to-end research workflow, covering literature discovery, research design thinking, execution support, and critical review in one integrated suite.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Intelligent multi-module routing for the full research loop: automatically matches user intent to the right sub-skill across literature research, problematization/concept-theory design, implementation aids (memos/coding/theme analysis), and argument/design critique.
  • Practical academic research deliverables: supports concrete outputs like structured paper analyses, coding/thematic analysis artifacts, and verification-style checks to reduce hallucinated citations.
  • Critique and robustness for drafts: performs Toulmin-style argument auditing, counterfactual stress testing, negative-case searching, and research design coherence checking.

Quick Start

Tell the agent: “帮我做研究:我对XX感兴趣,先给我找相关中文外文文献并初步分析这项研究的关键问题与可行框架。”

Frequently Asked Questions about RenJW-Research

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I structure an academic research workflow from a vague topic idea?

An academic research workflow routes your topic through literature search, research design, implementation support, and critical review modules to produce structured outputs like paper analyses and design frameworks.

Can I critique and stress-test my research design for robustness?

Yes, research design critique performs Toulmin-style argument auditing, counterfactual stress testing, negative-case searching, and coherence checking to evaluate and strengthen your draft's robustness.

How do I manage qualitative coding and memo writing during analysis?

Qualitative coding and memo writing are supported through implementation modules that generate coding artifacts and thematic analysis outputs, streamlining the transition from raw data to structured themes.

Does this approach help reduce hallucinated citations in literature reviews?

Literature review modules include verification-style checks designed to reduce hallucinated citations by producing structured paper analyses grounded in discovered sources rather than generated content.

What is the best way to start a literature review and problematization from scratch?

Starting from scratch involves intent routing to match your request to literature search and problematization sub-skills, yielding initial文献 analyses and a feasible research framework.

Are there limitations to automating the full research loop across four stages?

The workflow relies on YAML-frontmatter-driven skill activation and intent-trigger mapping, requiring precise intent articulation to correctly route requests across the four research stages without manual intervention.