repo-eval

Coordinate multi-agent codebase evaluations and generate remediation reports.

Updated Feb 20, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/HatmanStack/news-investor --skill repo-eval
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: repo-eval
Source: https://github.com/HatmanStack/news-investor/tree/main/.claude/skills/repo-eval
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/HatmanStack/news-investor --skill repo-eval

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes scripts (resource) and references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill automates the comprehensive evaluation of a codebase against defined role levels, identifying areas for improvement and remediation.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Multi-Agent Evaluation: Leverages three distinct AI agents (Pragmatist, Oncall Engineer, Team Lead) to assess a codebase from different perspectives.
  • Scoping and Customization: Gathers user input on role level, focus areas, and specific concerns to tailor the evaluation.
  • Detailed Reporting: Generates a consolidated evaluation document (eval.md) outlining scores, remediation targets, and detailed feedback from each agent.
  • Use Case: A hiring manager can use this Skill to objectively assess a candidate's take-home project against a Senior Developer benchmark, receiving a detailed report on code quality, architecture, and maintainability.

Quick Start

Use the repo-eval skill to evaluate the current codebase for a Mid-Level Developer role.

Frequently Asked Questions about repo-eval

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I evaluate a codebase for a specific developer role level?

You can evaluate a codebase by scoping the assessment against a defined role level, such as a Senior Developer benchmark, to generate a detailed remediation report on code quality and architecture. The system coordinates specialized agents to assess the project from different perspectives.

What is the best way to assess a candidate's take-home project objectively?

Assessing a take-home project objectively involves running parallel specialized evaluator agents that analyze code quality, architecture, and maintainability against a customized benchmark. This generates a consolidated document with scores and detailed feedback from multiple engineering perspectives.

Can I customize code review evaluations to focus on specific architectural concerns?

Yes, code review evaluations can be customized by gathering user input on specific focus areas and concerns before the assessment begins. This scoping process tailors the multi-agent evaluation to target the exact architectural or maintainability issues you need to analyze.

How does multi-agent code evaluation work for hiring assessments?

Multi-agent code evaluation works by deploying three distinct AI personas—a Pragmatist, an Oncall Engineer, and a Team Lead—to assess a codebase in parallel. Their individual findings are consolidated into a structured markdown document with scores and remediation targets.

What format does the codebase evaluation report use?

The codebase evaluation report is generated as a structured markdown document named eval.md. This file consolidates the findings from all parallel evaluator agents, providing detailed scores, remediation targets, and specific feedback for hiring or maintenance purposes.