requesting-code-review

Dispatch a code-reviewer subagent to review changes between base and head SHAs.

1|Updated Apr 17, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/ccakmak60/agentforge --skill requesting-code-review-ccakmak60
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: requesting-code-review
Source: https://github.com/ccakmak60/agentforge/tree/main/.trae/skills/requesting-code-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/ccakmak60/agentforge --skill requesting-code-review-ccakmak60

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Automates the code-review stage by dispatching a code-reviewer subagent to catch issues before they cascade. The reviewer gets precisely crafted context for evaluation — never your session's history. This keeps the reviewer focused on the work product, and preserves your own context for continued work.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Early issue detection: routes changes to a code-reviewer for structured feedback.
  • Task-driven review: supports mandatory reviews after each task and before merges.
  • Clear guidance: uses a standardized code-review template with baselines (BASE_SHA) and headings for feedback.

Quick Start

Dispatch a code-review for the current task and include BASE_SHA and HEAD_SHA context.

Frequently Asked Questions about requesting-code-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate a code review for a pull request before merging?

You can automate code review by dispatching a code-reviewer subagent to evaluate changes using a standardized checklist and structured inputs like base and head SHAs, ensuring issues are caught before merge.

What is the best way to run a structured code review without losing my session context?

A structured code review preserves your session context by dispatching an isolated subagent that receives precisely crafted context—such as the implemented description and SHAs—rather than your full session history.

How do I integrate automated quality assurance into a task-driven development workflow?

Automated quality assurance integrates into task-driven workflows by enforcing mandatory code reviews after each task completion and before merges, routing changes to a reviewer subagent for structured feedback.

What inputs do I need to provide to dispatch a code-reviewer for my git workflow?

To dispatch a code-reviewer in your git workflow, you need to provide the BASE_SHA, HEAD_SHA, and the implemented description, which the reviewer uses to evaluate changes against a standardized checklist.

Does automated code review work for major feature work or only small tasks?

Automated code review works for both major feature work and small tasks, applying structured pre-merge verification and early issue detection across software projects where formal reviews are required.

Can I use a subagent to catch code issues before they cascade into larger problems?

Yes, dispatching a code-reviewer subagent catches issues before they cascade by routing your changes to an isolated evaluator that applies a standardized code-review template to guide remediation.