requesting-code-review

Dispatches a code reviewer subagent to evaluate git diffs against requirements.

10|1|Updated Jul 29, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/flowing-abyss/obsidian-local-fonts --skill requesting-code-review-flowing-abyss
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: requesting-code-review
Source: https://github.com/flowing-abyss/obsidian-local-fonts/tree/main/.ai/skills/requesting-code-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/flowing-abyss/obsidian-local-fonts --skill requesting-code-review-flowing-abyss

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve? Completed code changes often go unreviewed or get shallow self-review, letting bugs and plan deviations cascade into later work. This Skill structures the process of dispatching an independent reviewer subagent with precisely crafted context before merging. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Structured Review Dispatch: Provides a repeatable workflow for gathering git SHAs and sending a reviewer subagent the exact context it needs, never your full session history. - Calibrated Reviewer Template: Ships a ready-to-use prompt template that enforces severity-categorized findings (Critical, Important, Minor), strengths acknowledgment, and a clear merge verdict. - Use Case: After finishing a feature task, you capture the base and head commit SHAs, fill the template placeholders, and receive a read-only review with file:line issues and a merge readiness assessment before proceeding. ## Quick Start Request a code review of my last commit against the task requirements using the code reviewer template.

Frequently Asked Questions about requesting-code-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I request a code review from an AI subagent?

Capture the base and head git SHAs for your change range, then dispatch a general-purpose subagent using the code-reviewer template with the description, requirements, and SHAs filled in. The reviewer returns categorized issues and a merge verdict.

When should I request a code review during development?

Request review after each task in subagent-driven development, after completing a major feature, and before merging to main. It is also valuable when stuck, before refactoring as a baseline check, or after fixing a complex bug.

What context does a code reviewer subagent need?

The reviewer needs a brief description of what was built, the plan or requirements it should satisfy, and the base and head commit SHAs defining the diff range. It should never receive your full session history, only precisely crafted context.

Can the reviewer subagent modify my code during review?

No. The template enforces a read-only review using git show, git diff, and git log. If another revision must be inspected, the reviewer uses a separate git worktree in a temporary directory rather than moving HEAD on your checkout.

What should I do if the code reviewer is wrong?

Push back with technical reasoning and show code or tests that prove the implementation works. You can also request clarification, but never ignore valid Critical or Important issues without addressing them.