skills.rest
zivtech
zivtechOFFICIAL
Explore all skills by this author →
WebsiteGitHub

research-critic

Audit research manuscripts for design flaws, statistical errors, and reporting guideline compliance.

Updated Mar 5, 2026
Search Tags:#research#methodology#audit#evidence#statistics#peer review
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/zivtech/joyus-desktop --skill research-critic-zivtech
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: research-critic
Source: https://github.com/zivtech/joyus-desktop/tree/main/.claude/skills/research-critic
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/zivtech/joyus-desktop --skill research-critic-zivtech

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This skill addresses the critical need for objective, high-level methodological scrutiny of research manuscripts, proposals, and studies to prevent the publication or adoption of flawed evidence.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Methodological Audit: Systematically evaluates study design, sampling, statistical appropriateness, and interpretive accuracy.
  • Severity Calibration: Distinguishes between cosmetic issues and fatal flaws using a structured CRITICAL/MAJOR/MINOR finding framework.
  • Use Case: A researcher preparing a manuscript for submission can use this skill to identify potential reviewer objections regarding confounding control or power adequacy before the work is ever seen by a journal editor.

Quick Start

Use the research-critic skill to perform a full methodological audit on the attached manuscript draft.

Frequently Asked Questions about research-critic

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
What is a methodological audit for research manuscripts?▼

A methodological audit systematically evaluates study design, sampling, statistical appropriateness, and interpretive accuracy to identify design flaws and prevent the publication of flawed evidence.

How do I check if my study meets CONSORT, STROBE, or PRISMA reporting guidelines?▼

You can check reporting guideline adherence by applying a 16-phase review protocol that evaluates your manuscript against CONSORT, STROBE, and PRISMA standards for rigorous compliance.

Can I use peer review to identify fatal flaws before journal submission?▼

Yes, pre-submission peer review can identify fatal flaws by distinguishing between cosmetic issues and critical errors using a structured CRITICAL, MAJOR, and MINOR finding framework.

What's the best way to audit statistical errors in clinical research?▼

The best way to audit statistical errors in clinical research is through a comprehensive methodological audit that evaluates statistical appropriateness and interpretive overreach for quality assurance.

Does methodological appraisal work for evidence-based policy evaluation?▼

Yes, methodological appraisal works for evidence-based policy by applying objective scrutiny to published studies, ensuring adopted evidence is free from design flaws and interpretive overreach.

Related Skills

Explore More Education & Research Skills→
learningmatter-mitlearningmatter-mit
144

general-peer-review

Evaluate research plans and manuscripts for scientific rigor with structured reviewer output.

Official
Intermediate
u9401066u9401066
11

manuscript-review

Detect methodological, statistical, ethical, and reporting-guideline issues in medical manuscript drafts.

Community
Advanced
ManfronEnricoManfronEnrico

scientific-critical-thinking

Evaluate scientific claims for validity, bias, and evidence quality.

Community
Advanced
sagunkayasthasagunkayastha

peer-review

Evaluate manuscripts and grant proposals using checklist-based peer review criteria.

Community
Advanced