research-lit

To summarize research papers for a literature review, you can search across Zotero, local PDFs, and Obsidian to extract key claims and metadata. The skill generates structured literature tables and narrative syntheses, grouping papers by approach to reveal consensus and research gaps.

Synthesizing academic literature across multiple sources involves searching Zotero, Obsidian, local PDFs, and the web, then applying de-duplication and topic-driven ranking. This approach extracts metadata and key claims to produce a coherent narrative synthesis and structured overview for research planning.

Yes, you can generate BibTeX exports and structured literature tables from web sources, Obsidian, and local PDFs. The skill extracts metadata including titles, authors, and venues, applying de-duplication to assemble a clean, output-ready set of ranked papers for citation.

Yes, this literature review tool works with Zotero and Obsidian to search sources and extract annotations. It scans academic papers across these platforms to extract key claims, methods, and relevance, grouping them by approach to support rapid literature scanning and research planning.

To find research gaps and consensus when comparing academic papers, the skill extracts methods and key claims, then groups papers by approach. This grouping reveals consensus and existing gaps, providing a ranked set of papers with summaries and a narrative synthesis for writing literature reviews.

Automated literature scanning for research planning relies on available sources like Zotero, Obsidian, local PDFs, and web results. While it applies de-duplication and topic-driven ranking, the quality of the narrative synthesis and structured literature tables depends on the completeness of the input sources.