reversa-strategist

Migration strategy evaluation assesses legacy-system size, paradigm gap severity, and stakeholder appetite to recommend an approach with explicit trade-offs. It generates a migration strategy, risk register, and cutover plan for final human selection.

Cutover planning for critical business rules applies appetite constraints and paradigm gap severity to architect the transition. It outputs cutover_plan.md aligned with the chosen strategy to handle regulatory and financial logic edge cases.

Human-in-the-loop governance for migration strategy selection means the system produces a recommendation and rationale but never decides the final approach. The decision remains with the user, ensuring oversight of legacy-to-target transitions.

Risk register creation for legacy system migration evaluates the migration brief and paradigm decision inputs. It produces risk_register.md documenting identified risks and trade-offs aligned to the recommended cutover strategy.

Migration strategy evaluation handles severe paradigm gaps by deriving gap severity and stakeholder appetite from paradigm decision inputs. It assesses applicability using an advisory catalog to recommend a trade-off-aware transition approach.

Automated migration strategy recommendation cannot decide the final approach or handle undefined constraints autonomously. It requires human selection and approval, serving as an advisory tool that produces rationale rather than executing the migration.