Reviews code changes and returns prioritized actionable defect findings.
npx skills add https://github.com/Chau165/local_skill --skill review-agent-chau165
Please help me install this Agent Skill. Skill: review-agent Source: https://github.com/Chau165/local_skill/tree/main/codex/skills/.system/review-agent Command: npx skills add https://github.com/Chau165/local_skill --skill review-agent-chau165
git merge-base to review the changes that would actually merge, avoiding misleading diffs against branch tips. - Prioritized Findings: Reports each issue with a P0-P3 severity, a file and line citation, and a short explanation, followed by an overall assessment and test gaps. - Use Case: After finishing a feature branch, delegate a review before opening a pull request to catch correctness, security, or performance regressions without modifying any files. ## Quick Start Use the review-agent skill to review my uncommitted changes and return all actionable findings.High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.
Delegate the review target to the review-agent skill, which inspects the full diff of your uncommitted changes plus surrounding code. It returns only concrete defects introduced by the change, ordered by severity with file and line citations.
It resolves the branch's upstream when available, runs git merge-base HEAD against that comparison ref, and reviews the resulting diff. This ensures it examines the changes that would actually merge rather than diffing against the branch tip.
It flags discrete, actionable regressions affecting correctness, security, performance, or maintainability that were introduced by the reviewed change. It skips speculative concerns, pre-existing problems, intentional behavior changes, and style nits.
No. The review is strictly read-only: it does not modify files, create commits, push branches, post review comments, or delegate to another agent. It only returns findings and an overall assessment.
The agent reports "No findings." rather than inventing issues to fill the result. It still adds a brief overall assessment noting any material test gaps or residual risks.
looooonkReviews code changes and returns prioritized, actionable defect findings.
brsblAnalyze code changes to identify bugs and quality issues.
crinisReviews CSS code for redundancy, duplication, and semantic consistency with linters.
nvieReviews GitHub pull requests through progressive, layered code analysis.