review-all-gdds

Cross-GDD consistency review scans all MVP game design documents to detect contradictions, outdated references, and ownership conflicts. It validates alignment with core pillars and aggregates findings into a structured report before architecture planning begins.

Cross-GDD consistency review is a validation process that checks MVP game design documents for formula incompatibilities and design-theory violations like dominant strategies. It surfaces dependencies and ownership inconsistencies to guide architectural decisions.

Run a cross-GDD design review after drafting MVP game design documents and before architecture planning begins. This timing ensures all design documents align with core pillars and resolves formula incompatibilities prior to implementation.

Cross-GDD review detects design-theory violations by scanning game design documents for dominant strategies, economic balance issues, cognitive load problems, and pillar drift. It aggregates these findings into a structured report with actionable recommendations.

Yes, cross-GDD aggregation and validation surfaces ownership conflicts, stale references, and cross-document dependencies. It scans all MVP game design documents to identify these inconsistencies and outputs a structured review report.

Cross-GDD consistency review identifies incompatible formulas across all MVP game design documents. It detects these mathematical conflicts during the post-drafting phase and provides actionable recommendations to resolve them before architecture planning.