review-all-gdds

To check game design documents for consistency, you can review multiple GDDs simultaneously to identify contradictions, stale references, and ownership conflicts across all files. This ensures cross-GDD coherence before architecture begins.

Game design theory violation detection analyzes system interactions within GDDs to spot dominant strategies, economic imbalances, cognitive overload, and pillar drift. It ensures holistic adherence to established game design principles.

You can review all GDDs for formula compatibility by running a full analysis across the documents to verify mathematical and logical consistency. This catches potential system interaction issues early before development starts.

Yes, checking for pillar drift and economic imbalance requires prior knowledge of game design principles to effectively analyze system interactions. The review process depends on understanding these concepts to identify violations accurately.

The best way to ensure cross-GDD consistency is to analyze all documents simultaneously, checking for stale references, ownership conflicts, and formula compatibility. This holistic review prevents design contradictions before implementation.

Your game design review may fail to catch ownership conflicts if it does not analyze multiple GDDs simultaneously. Cross-referencing all documents together is required to identify overlapping responsibilities and stale references.