review-cluster

Orchestrate a parallel 4-agent adversarial review of academic papers.

127|22|Updated Feb 20, 2026

Search Tags:#academic writing #paper review #adversarial review #revision planning #mid-draft feedback

Ready to run

npx skills add https://github.com/flonat/flonat-research --skill review-cluster

💬 Prompt for ChatGPT / Claude Chat▼

Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: review-cluster
Source: https://github.com/flonat/flonat-research/tree/main/skills/review-cluster
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/flonat/flonat-research --skill review-cluster

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes scripts (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill automates a mid-draft adversarial review of academic papers, generating a prioritized revision plan for authors to address key issues before submission.

Core Features & Use Cases

Mid-Draft Adversarial Review: Runs parallel reviews from four different perspectives on an active-drafting paper.
Automated Synthesis: Auto-generates a consolidated report and a prioritized revision plan based on the reviews.
Use Case: An author uses this Skill during active paper writing or mid-revision stages to receive structured feedback and actionable suggestions for improvement.

Quick Start

To start the review process for a paper in the current directory, use the command: /review-cluster.

Frequently Asked Questions about review-cluster

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema

How do I get automated mid-draft feedback for an academic paper?▼

Automated mid-draft feedback for an academic paper is generated by running a parallel 4-agent adversarial review process that synthesizes findings into a prioritized revision plan before submission.

What is an adversarial paper review and when do I need it?▼

An adversarial paper review critically evaluates an active academic draft from multiple parallel perspectives to identify weaknesses. You need it during active writing or mid-revision stages to strengthen the manuscript.

How do I generate a prioritized revision plan from multiple paper reviews?▼

Generating a prioritized revision plan involves synthesizing parallel adversarial feedback into a consolidated report. The process automatically orders actionable suggestions to guide iterative manuscript improvement.

Can I use an automated review process on an active academic draft?▼

Yes, you can use an automated review process on an active academic draft. It is specifically intended for mid-draft and mid-revision stages to provide iterative improvement feedback without requiring a completed manuscript.

Does the automated academic review process require any external dependencies?▼

No, the automated academic review process requires no external dependencies. It operates independently using integrated scripts to orchestrate the parallel 4-agent adversarial review and generate the final revision plan.