review-cluster

Orchestrate a parallel 4-agent adversarial review of academic papers.

127|22|Updated Feb 20, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/flonat/flonat-research --skill review-cluster
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: review-cluster
Source: https://github.com/flonat/flonat-research/tree/main/skills/review-cluster
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/flonat/flonat-research --skill review-cluster

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes scripts (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill automates a mid-draft adversarial review of academic papers, generating a prioritized revision plan for authors to address key issues before submission.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Mid-Draft Adversarial Review: Runs parallel reviews from four different perspectives on an active-drafting paper.
  • Automated Synthesis: Auto-generates a consolidated report and a prioritized revision plan based on the reviews.
  • Use Case: An author uses this Skill during active paper writing or mid-revision stages to receive structured feedback and actionable suggestions for improvement.

Quick Start

To start the review process for a paper in the current directory, use the command: /review-cluster.

Frequently Asked Questions about review-cluster

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I get automated mid-draft feedback for an academic paper?

Automated mid-draft feedback for an academic paper is generated by running a parallel 4-agent adversarial review process that synthesizes findings into a prioritized revision plan before submission.

What is an adversarial paper review and when do I need it?

An adversarial paper review critically evaluates an active academic draft from multiple parallel perspectives to identify weaknesses. You need it during active writing or mid-revision stages to strengthen the manuscript.

How do I generate a prioritized revision plan from multiple paper reviews?

Generating a prioritized revision plan involves synthesizing parallel adversarial feedback into a consolidated report. The process automatically orders actionable suggestions to guide iterative manuscript improvement.

Can I use an automated review process on an active academic draft?

Yes, you can use an automated review process on an active academic draft. It is specifically intended for mid-draft and mid-revision stages to provide iterative improvement feedback without requiring a completed manuscript.

Does the automated academic review process require any external dependencies?

No, the automated academic review process requires no external dependencies. It operates independently using integrated scripts to orchestrate the parallel 4-agent adversarial review and generate the final revision plan.