skills.rest
sambeau
sambeauCOMMUNITY
Explore all skills by this author →
WebsiteGitHub

review-code

Evaluate code changes against formal specifications with evidence-backed findings.

5|Updated Mar 18, 2026
Search Tags:#automation#audit#governance#evidence#code-review#spec-conformance
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/sambeau/kanbanzai --skill review-code-sambeau
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: review-code
Source: https://github.com/sambeau/kanbanzai/tree/main/.kbz/skills/review-code
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/sambeau/kanbanzai --skill review-code-sambeau

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This skill provides a structured, specification-driven review of code changes, delivering concise, evidence-backed findings that help teams verify conformance and quality.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Per-dimension review: spec_conformance, implementation_quality, test_adequacy, and more, with formal findings and evidence locations.
  • Evidence-backed verdicts: each blocking finding cites a spec anchor and a precise code location.
  • Remediation guidance: actionable recommendations for each non-blocking finding and overall remediation path.
  • Audit-friendly reports: machine-readable outputs suitable for integration with CI pipelines and governance processes.

Quick Start

Provide a code patch and the related specification, then request a structured review to generate a formal, evidence-backed report.

Frequently Asked Questions about review-code

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate code reviews to check spec conformance?▼

Automate spec conformance by assessing code patches against formal specifications to identify gaps. The review evaluates dimensions like implementation quality and test adequacy, mapping blocking findings to specific spec anchors with precise code locations.

What is specification-driven code review and how does it work?▼

Specification-driven code review evaluates code changes against formal specifications to identify conformance gaps and quality issues. It performs per-dimension evaluation, generating evidence-backed reports that map findings to specific spec anchors and code locations.

Can I integrate structured code review reports into CI pipelines?▼

Structured code review reports are machine-readable and suitable for integration with CI pipelines. The output provides evidence-backed findings with spec citations and remediation recommendations, supporting automated governance and audit processes.

How do I generate audit-friendly evidence for code quality checks?▼

Generate audit-friendly evidence by running a structured review that produces machine-readable outputs. Each blocking finding cites a formal spec anchor and a precise code location, ensuring governance processes have verifiable evidence for conformance gaps.

What's the best way to map code changes to formal specifications?▼

Map code changes to formal specifications by performing a per-dimension evaluation across spec conformance, implementation quality, and test adequacy. This produces evidence-backed findings that precisely map code locations to spec anchors with remediation guidance.

Does structured code review provide remediation recommendations for non-blocking findings?▼

Structured code review provides actionable remediation recommendations for each non-blocking finding. It delivers an overall remediation path alongside evidence-backed verdicts, ensuring teams can address quality issues and conformance gaps effectively.

Related Skills

Explore More Software Engineering Skills→
chausskychaussky
40

requirements_approve

Automate formal approval of verified requirements and baseline creation.

Community
Advanced
mkrlabsmkrlabs

review-findings-contract

Normalize reviewer agent findings into machine-readable ledger-ready verdicts.

Official
Intermediate
johanruttensjohanruttens

qa-engineer

Provide expert QA guidance for software testing and quality assurance.

Community
Advanced
CaptainCrouton89CaptainCrouton89
497

Reviewing Code

Evaluate code changes for security, correctness, performance, and spec alignment.

Community
Basic