skills.rest
leoplasture
leoplastureCOMMUNITY
Explore all skills by this author →
GitHub

review

Audits scientific papers, drafts, and reports for rigor, novelty, and validity.

Updated May 24, 2026
Search Tags:#paper review#audit report#technical audit#scientific validation#draft assessment
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/leoplasture/STA304_Final_Project --skill review-leoplasture
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: review
Source: https://github.com/leoplasture/STA304_Final_Project/tree/main/src/skills/review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/leoplasture/STA304_Final_Project --skill review-leoplasture

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes scripts (resource) and references (resource) and assets (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill provides a thorough, evidence-based audit of drafts, papers, or reports to ensure technical rigor, clarity, and validity before finalization.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Skeptical Audit: Perform an independent, evidence-grounded audit of the content.
  • Technical Rigor: Evaluate the novelty, value, rigor, clarity, and evidence sufficiency.
  • Use Case: Use this Skill when you have a substantial draft or paper and need a detailed, critical review before submission.

Quick Start

Run the review skill on your draft paper to get a detailed audit report.

Frequently Asked Questions about review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I conduct an evidence-based audit of a technical paper draft?▼

An evidence-based audit of a technical paper draft evaluates technical rigor, novelty, and validity by cross-referencing the manuscript with supporting evidence and related literature to identify strengths, weaknesses, and actionable suggestions.

What does a skeptical draft assessment evaluate before finalization?▼

A skeptical draft assessment evaluates technical rigor, clarity, novelty, and evidence sufficiency to ensure manuscript validity, outputting a detailed review report with critical feedback before finalization.

How do I perform a scientific validation of my report for technical rigor?▼

Scientific validation for technical rigor requires accessing the manuscript, supporting evidence, and related literature to perform an independent audit that assesses value and validity.

Can I use an automated review to find weaknesses in my scientific paper?▼

An automated review can find weaknesses in a scientific paper by performing a detailed, evidence-grounded audit that outputs a report identifying technical weaknesses and actionable suggestions.

What literature do I need for a technical audit of a draft manuscript?▼

A technical audit of a draft manuscript requires access to the supporting evidence and related literature to properly assess the document's technical rigor and scientific validity.

When should I request a draft assessment for my research paper?▼

You should request a draft assessment when you have a substantial paper or report ready and need a detailed, critical scientific validation before final submission.

Related Skills

Explore More Education & Research Skills→
rauffatalirauffatali

scientific-writing

Draft and revise scientific manuscript sections grounded in verified research artifacts.

Community
Advanced
louzhengshuailouzhengshuai

review

Audit research drafts for clarity, rigor, and evidence sufficiency.

Community
Advanced
jkfeejkfee

novelty-check

Cross-check proposed method claims against recent literature for novelty.

Community
Advanced
sagunkayasthasagunkayastha

peer-review

Evaluate manuscripts and grant proposals using checklist-based peer review criteria.

Community
Advanced