review

Audit research drafts for clarity, rigor, and evidence sufficiency.

Updated Jul 1, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/louzhengshuai/seepscientist --skill review-louzhengshuai
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: review
Source: https://github.com/louzhengshuai/seepscientist/tree/main/src/skills/review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/louzhengshuai/seepscientist --skill review-louzhengshuai

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes scripts (resource) and references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill helps researchers conduct a thorough and evidence-based audit of their research drafts, ensuring clarity, rigor, and defensibility before final submission.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Skeptical Audit: Provides an independent, evidence-grounded review of research drafts.
  • Technical Guidance: Offers actionable suggestions for improving the manuscript's quality.
  • Use Case: Imagine you have a completed research draft that needs a critical evaluation before submission. Use this Skill to ensure your work meets the necessary standards for novelty, rigor, and clarity.

Quick Start

Run the review skill on your research draft to generate a detailed review report and revision plan.

Frequently Asked Questions about review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I conduct a skeptical audit of a research manuscript before submission?

To audit research drafts, you provide the completed manuscript and its related dataset for analysis, which generates a detailed review report and a structured revision plan.

What does a comprehensive research draft review check for?

It provides an independent, evidence-grounded evaluation of your research drafts, generating actionable suggestions to improve the manuscript's technical quality and defensibility.

Do I need to provide my research data for a manuscript quality assurance check?

Yes, conducting manuscript quality assurance requires both the research draft and its related data for analysis to accurately evaluate evidence sufficiency and methodological rigor.

Can I use an automated audit to find evidence gaps in my research drafts?

Yes, an automated audit analyzes your research drafts and related data to identify evidence gaps, providing technical guidance and actionable revision recommendations to improve defensibility.

What is the best way to get actionable revision recommendations for a manuscript?

The best way to get actionable revision recommendations is running an evidence-grounded audit on your research draft, which evaluates rigor and returns a detailed revision plan.