skills.rest
buchananwill
buchananwillCOMMUNITY
Explore all skills by this author →
GitHub

review-output-schema

Enforce structured BLOCKING, WARNING, and Summary sections in code reviews.

2|Updated Mar 17, 2026
Search Tags:#template#structure#evidence#review#code-review#blocker
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/buchananwill/ue-claude-scaffold --skill review-output-schema
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: review-output-schema
Source: https://github.com/buchananwill/ue-claude-scaffold/tree/main/skills/review-output-schema
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/buchananwill/ue-claude-scaffold --skill review-output-schema

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill standardizes review outputs by enforcing a structured, machine-readable template that captures findings in a consistent format.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Enforces a BLOCKING/WARNING/Summary template with an evidence section and a clear verdict.
  • Supports domain-specific findings and a composable workflow that can be reused across multiple reviews.
  • Useful for audit trails, consistent reporting, and automation-friendly review processes.

Quick Start

Provide a structured code review by applying the BLOCKING, WARNING, and Summary sections to your findings.

Frequently Asked Questions about review-output-schema

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I standardize code review outputs with a structured format?▼

You can standardize code review outputs by applying a machine-readable template that enforces BLOCKING, WARNING, and Summary sections with evidence. This ensures consistent reporting and audit trails across software projects.

What is a structured code review template with blocking and warning sections?▼

A structured code review template is a machine-readable format that separates findings into BLOCKING, WARNING, and Summary sections. It requires evidence for each finding and applies a fixed verdict rubric to standardize quality assessments.

Can I use a standardized review template for domain-specific code quality assessments?▼

Yes, the standardized review template supports domain-specific findings alongside its fixed BLOCKING, WARNING, and Summary sections. This allows you to tailor quality assessments to specific software project domains while maintaining a consistent output format.

How do I create an automation-friendly code review report with a clear verdict?▼

You can create automation-friendly review reports by enforcing a machine-readable template with a fixed verdict rubric. The structured output includes frontmatter-defined metadata and evidence-backed findings, enabling automated parsing and consistent audit trails.

What is the best way to capture evidence in a machine-readable code review output?▼

The best way to capture evidence in machine-readable review outputs is by using a structured template that enforces evidence sections for each BLOCKING or WARNING finding. This ensures all code review findings are backed by consistent, verifiable proof.

Related Skills

Explore More Software Engineering Skills→
Synaptic-Labs-AISynaptic-Labs-AI
71

pact-prepare-research

Conduct structured research and documentation gathering for the PACT Prepare phase.

Official
Advanced
gonzalezpazmonicagonzalezpazmonica
47

governance-enterprise

Orchestrate enterprise governance workflows for audit trails, compliance, and certifications.

Community
Advanced
dreamingechoesdreamingechoes
2

code-review

Generate structured code review feedback with severity-classified findings and fixes.

Community
Advanced
l3ochol3ocho

review-checklist

Classify code review findings by severity rubric for sprint reviews.

Community
Intermediate