Verified:GitHub

review-paper

Generate structured referee reports evaluating academic manuscripts across six review dimensions.

21|4|Updated Mar 14, 2026

Search Tags:#political science #academic publishing #peer review #econometrics #manuscript critique #research quality #referee report

Ready to run

npx skills add https://github.com/HaipingXu/social-science-claude-scholar --skill review-paper-haipingxu

💬 Prompt for ChatGPT / Claude Chat▼

Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: review-paper
Source: https://github.com/HaipingXu/social-science-claude-scholar/tree/main/skills/review-paper
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/HaipingXu/social-science-claude-scholar --skill review-paper-haipingxu

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes scripts (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill helps researchers identify weaknesses and potential objections in their academic manuscripts by simulating a rigorous peer review process, ensuring higher quality submissions.

Core Features & Use Cases

Comprehensive Evaluation: Assesses papers across 6 critical dimensions: Argument Structure, Identification & Causal Credibility, Econometric Specification, Literature Positioning, Writing Quality, and Data & Measurement.
Referee Report Generation: Produces a structured report detailing major and minor concerns, potential referee objections, and specific comments, mimicking a top-tier journal referee.
Use Case: Before submitting a paper to AER, use this Skill to get a simulated referee report, highlighting areas that need improvement in identification strategy or literature review.

Quick Start

Use the review-paper skill to generate a referee report for the paper located at /path/to/my_manuscript.tex.

Frequently Asked Questions about review-paper

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema

How do I get a simulated peer review for my academic manuscript before submission?▼

Simulating peer review for academic manuscripts involves generating a structured referee report that identifies weaknesses and potential objections. This Skill evaluates papers across six dimensions including argument structure and identification strategy to ensure higher quality submissions.

How to generate a referee report that critiques econometric specification and identification strategy?▼

To generate a referee report critiquing econometric specification and identification strategy, process your manuscript through this Skill. It produces a structured evaluation detailing major concerns, potential referee objections, and suggested fixes for top-tier journal standards.

Can I use this peer review simulation for political science papers targeting APSR or AJPS?▼

Yes, you can use this peer review simulation for political science papers targeting APSR or AJPS. The Skill simulates the review process of top-tier journals, specifically including APSR and AJPS, to assess research quality and manuscript critique dimensions.

What does a simulated referee report evaluate in an academic manuscript?▼

A simulated referee report evaluates academic manuscripts across six critical dimensions: argument structure, identification and causal credibility, econometric specification, literature positioning, writing quality, and data and measurement, providing detailed objections and suggested fixes.

What is the best way to identify weaknesses in my research quality before journal submission?▼

The best way to identify weaknesses in research quality before journal submission is to generate a simulated referee report. This Skill provides a comprehensive manuscript critique across six dimensions, detailing major and minor concerns with specific suggested fixes.