Launch a multi-agent editorial review of research papers and update state files.
npx skills add https://github.com/queelius/claude-anvil --skill review-queelius
Please help me install this Agent Skill. Skill: review Source: https://github.com/queelius/claude-anvil/tree/main/papermill/skills/review Command: npx skills add https://github.com/queelius/claude-anvil --skill review-queelius
This Skill provides a structured, multi-agent system for comprehensive editorial review of research papers, identifying areas for improvement and ensuring readiness for submission.
Initiate a comprehensive multi-agent review of your paper by running the review skill.
High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.
Yes, a multi-agent review system provides comprehensive manuscript assessment by deploying specialist agents for literature scouting and domain review. These agents evaluate logic, methodology, and prose to deliver targeted feedback for journal readiness.
A multi-agent editorial review system evaluates methodology by orchestrating six domain reviewer agents alongside two literature scouts, analyzing logic and novelty while referencing existing paper state files to produce a comprehensive, context-aware review report.
Integrating existing paper state files for academic review is fully supported. The multi-agent system reads thesis, venue, and history context from the state file to target its editorial feedback, subsequently updating the same file with the completed review history.
Setting up a multi-agent review requires deploying agents for literature scouting, domain review, and orchestration, alongside existing paper state files containing thesis, venue, and history. These components provide the contextual environment needed to execute the review.
Limitations of this automated research paper review system include its strict dependency on existing paper state files and its requirement for dedicated literature scouting, domain review, and orchestration agents. Without these, the system cannot produce its unified editorial report.
carson-sweetManage academic paper development through a six-phase quality-gated pipeline.
AperivueGenerate anticipated reviewer comments with severity framing for manuscript submissions.
shusuke-iokuOrchestrates three independent reviewer roles to generate a consolidated decision and editor report.
LadvienWrite, review, and format academic papers via a 12-agent pipeline.
