review-r

Audit R code for methodological flaws in econometric research.

5|1|Updated Feb 10, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/mgaldino/agents-workflow --skill review-r-mgaldino
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: review-r
Source: https://github.com/mgaldino/agents-workflow/tree/main/skills-docs/review-r
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/mgaldino/agents-workflow --skill review-r-mgaldino

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Audit R code used in academic political science and econometrics research to detect methodological flaws and improve reliability.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Assess methodological correctness of econometric specifications and robustness checks
  • Evaluate code quality, style, and readability aligned with tidyverse/tidymodels conventions
  • Ensure reproducibility through clear documentation, data handling, and project structure

Quick Start

Run a structured review of the provided R code file and deliver a report covering methodological correctness, code quality, reproducibility, performance, and result presentation.

Frequently Asked Questions about review-r

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I audit R code for methodological flaws in econometrics research?

To audit R code for econometrics research, you review scripts to detect methodological flaws and improve reliability. This process evaluates econometric specifications, robustness checks, and reproducible workflows to ensure correctness.

What is the best way to check reproducibility in academic political science R scripts?

Checking reproducibility in political science R scripts involves evaluating documentation, data handling, and project structure. A structured review ensures clear result presentation and verifies that analyses can be reliably reproduced.

Can I use this approach to review R notebooks for theses and academic publications?

Yes, you can review R notebooks for theses and academic publications. The review process is applicable to scripts and notebooks across research projects, assessing code quality, error handling, and packaging practices.

How do I evaluate if my R code meets tidyverse and tidymodels conventions?

To evaluate if R code meets tidyverse and tidymodels conventions, assess code quality, style, and readability. A structured review checks alignment with these conventions to improve overall script reliability.

What does a structured R code review cover for econometric specifications?

A structured R code review for econometric specifications covers methodological correctness, code quality, reproducibility, performance, and result presentation. It identifies flaws in data preprocessing and analysis workflows.