skills.rest
rbergman
rbergmanCOMMUNITY
Explore all skills by this author →
GitHub

review

Orchestrate collaborative code reviews by Agent Teams into unified verdicts.

11|5|Updated Jan 9, 2026
Search Tags:#code-review#team-collaboration#review-workflow#agent-teams#scout-phase#unified-verdict
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/rbergman/dark-matter-marketplace --skill review-rbergman
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: review
Source: https://github.com/rbergman/dark-matter-marketplace/tree/main/plugins/teams/skills/review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/rbergman/dark-matter-marketplace --skill review-rbergman

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Collaborative code review using Agent Teams to unify assessments and reduce conflicting findings.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Team-based composition for diverse expertise
  • Scout phase, phased reviews, and cross-domain connections
  • Unified verdict with structured output and severity filtering
  • Supports team-based collaboration and escalation paths

Quick Start

Use the team review skill to orchestrate a collaborative code review with Agent Teams. Start by invoking the dm-work:review workflow for a pull request and assign teammates to domains.

Frequently Asked Questions about review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I coordinate team-based code reviews for complex pull requests?▼

Team-based code reviews are coordinated through a multi-phase workflow that assigns teammates to specific domains, enabling parallel reviews and cross-examination before synthesizing a final, unified assessment.

What is a scout phase in a collaborative code review workflow?▼

A scout phase in a collaborative code review is the initial stage of a multi-phase workflow that precedes independent teammate reviews and cross-domain connections, establishing the foundation for a unified verdict.

How do I resolve conflicting findings from parallel code reviews?▼

Conflicting findings from parallel code reviews are resolved through a cross-examination process that synthesizes independent teammate assessments into a single unified verdict with structured output and severity filtering.

Can I filter code review results by severity for security-sensitive pull requests?▼

Security-sensitive code review results can be filtered by severity using the standardized output format, allowing teams to isolate critical findings from the synthesized verdict during the collaborative workflow.

Does the team review workflow support escalation paths for complex domains?▼

The team review workflow supports escalation paths for complex domains, routing findings through team-based collaboration, cross-domain connections, and a phased review structure before reaching the final verdict.

Related Skills

Explore More Software Engineering Skills→
CornjebusCornjebus
1

github-code-review

Coordinate multi-agent code reviews for GitHub pull requests.

Community
Advanced
cy-walicy-wali

deploy-checklist

Validate tests, migrations, feature flags, and approvals for deployment readiness.

Community
Advanced
lxh755818-botlxh755818-bot

requesting-code-review

Automate pre-commit code review with security scans, linting, and testing.

Community
Advanced
sukeun1997sukeun1997

review

Automate staged code reviews across security, quality, and architecture.

Community
Advanced