review-response

Analyze reviewer comments and generate structured rebuttal responses.

5|2|Updated Jul 2, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/Tx1207/hello-scholar --skill review-response-tx1207
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: review-response
Source: https://github.com/Tx1207/hello-scholar/tree/main/skills/submission/review-response
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/Tx1207/hello-scholar --skill review-response-tx1207

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

Reviewer feedback often arrives as scattered comments and criteria, making it hard to craft a coherent, persuasive rebuttal that preserves tone and supported claims. This workflow provides a structured process to transform comments into a policy-compliant, evidence-backed response.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Review Analysis: classify comments into major/minor issues and misunderstandings.
  • Response Strategy: select Accept, Defend, Clarify, or Experiment strategies for each point.
  • Rebuttal Writing: generate a structured, professional rebuttal document with clear changes traceability.
  • Tone Management: ensure respectful, evidence-based, and impact-focused language.
  • Use Case: preparing a NeurIPS/ICML/ICLR-style rebuttal, including templates and tone guidance.

Quick Start

Provide reviewer comments and I will draft a structured rebuttal outline.

Frequently Asked Questions about review-response

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I write a structured rebuttal response for peer review feedback?

Draft a structured rebuttal response by classifying peer review feedback into major and minor issues, then selecting a strategy like Accept, Defend, or Clarify for each point to ensure a professional and evidence-backed reply.

What is the best way to format a rebuttal for a NeurIPS or ICML paper submission?

Format a NeurIPS or ICML rebuttal using template-guided drafting that enforces professional tone, strategically addresses reviewer comments, and explicitly places changes and evidence to ensure policy-compliant responses.

Can I use templates to manage tone in peer-review responses?

Yes, you can use templates to manage tone in peer-review responses by applying tone guidelines that ensure respectful, evidence-based, and impact-focused language throughout your manuscript rebuttal.

How do I address misunderstandings in reviewer comments without sounding defensive?

Address reviewer misunderstandings by applying tone management to generate respectful responses, selecting a Clarify strategy to explain the issue, and providing explicit evidence to support your original manuscript claims.

What strategies help organize scattered peer-review comments into a coherent rebuttal?

Organize scattered peer-review comments by analyzing and classifying them into major or minor issues, then mapping each point to a structured response strategy to create a coherent and persuasive rebuttal document.