review-revise

Review and revise papers through multi-round cycles with user confirmation.

Updated Jun 18, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/Hjhnb-star/ecr_grpo_agent --skill review-revise
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: review-revise
Source: https://github.com/Hjhnb-star/ecr_grpo_agent/tree/main/.agents/skills/review-revise
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/Hjhnb-star/ecr_grpo_agent --skill review-revise

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes scripts (resource) and references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill addresses the issue of improving paper quality through a structured multi-round review-revise process, ensuring systematic enhancements while maintaining user control over modifications.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Multi-Round Review: Conducts iterative review cycles based on checker findings to refine paper quality.
  • User Confirmation: Requires explicit user confirmation for each modification, ensuring careful and auditable improvements.
  • Checker Integration: Integrates findings from seven different checker families to identify and resolve issues.
  • Use Case: Ideal for users who want to systematically review and revise their papers, ensuring high-quality content through a guided process.

Quick Start

Run the review-revise skill on your paper to begin the multi-round review and revision process.

Frequently Asked Questions about review-revise

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I systematically improve paper quality through multi-round revision?

To systematically improve paper quality, run a multi-round review-revise process that integrates outputs from seven checker families. This conducts iterative review cycles to identify issues and applies structured, auditable modifications to refine the content.

How does the user confirmation mechanism work during paper review?

The user confirmation mechanism requires explicit approval for each proposed modification during paper review. This ensures you maintain complete control over all changes, keeping the revision process transparent and fully auditable.

What inputs do I need to start a systematic paper review and revision process?

You need the paper content and checker outputs from seven checker families to start a systematic review and revision process. These inputs provide the baseline text and diagnostic findings required to guide the multi-round revision cycles.

Can I integrate checker outputs to guide iterative paper revisions?

Yes, you can integrate checker outputs to guide iterative paper revisions. The process systematically consumes findings from seven distinct checker families to identify and resolve issues through structured, multi-round review cycles.

What is the best way to audit paper modifications during a multi-round review?

The best way to audit paper modifications is to use a process that requires explicit user confirmation for each change. This ensures every modification is reviewed and approved, creating a structured and auditable trail of improvements.