review-revise

Review and revise academic papers through multi-round cycles with user confirmation.

43|2|Updated Apr 5, 2026

Search Tags:#review process #revision #academic paper #systematic improvement #checker integration

Ready to run

npx skills add https://github.com/PKU-ASAL/CoPaper-OpenCode --skill review-revise-pku-asal

💬 Prompt for ChatGPT / Claude Chat▼

Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: review-revise
Source: https://github.com/PKU-ASAL/CoPaper-OpenCode/tree/main/.agents/skills/review-revise
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/PKU-ASAL/CoPaper-OpenCode --skill review-revise-pku-asal

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes scripts (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

The Skill unit addresses the challenge of reviewing and revising academic papers systematically, ensuring high-quality content through a structured multi-round process.

Core Features & Use Cases

Structured Review-Revise Loop: Guides the user through a multi-round review and revision process based on checker findings.
Severity-based Issue Processing: Ensures that critical issues are addressed first, followed by major and minor ones.
User Confirmation Required: Each change is applied only after explicit user confirmation, maintaining control over modifications.
Integration with Checkers: Seamlessly integrates with the seven-checker workflow for thorough paper analysis.
Use Case: For a researcher who needs to review and revise a paper, the skill can be activated to initiate a systematic improvement process.

Quick Start

To start the review-revise process, initiate the 'review-revise' skill.

Frequently Asked Questions about review-revise

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema

How do I systematically review and revise an academic paper?▼

To systematically review and revise an academic paper, this process guides you through a structured multi-round loop based on checker findings, processing critical issues first and requiring explicit user confirmation for each modification.

What is the systematic improvement process for academic paper revision?▼

The systematic improvement process integrates seven-checker outputs to identify issues, categorizes them by severity to address critical flaws first, and applies changes only after you confirm each proposed modification during the multi-round revision cycle.

How do I start a multi-round review and revision cycle for my manuscript?▼

You start a multi-round review and revision cycle by initiating the review-revise process, which then integrates with existing workflow tools to analyze your paper and report progress for each severity-based issue processed.

Can I control which changes are applied during the academic paper review process?▼

Yes, you maintain control during the academic paper review process because each change is applied only after explicit user confirmation, ensuring you approve every modification suggested by the checker integration.

Does the systematic paper revision work with existing checker workflow tools?▼

Yes, the systematic paper revision seamlessly integrates with existing workflow tools and the seven-checker families to conduct thorough analysis, handling multi-round cycles while reporting progress throughout the review.

How are critical issues prioritized during academic paper revision?▼

During academic paper revision, critical issues are prioritized using a severity-based processing approach that ensures critical findings are addressed first, followed by major and minor ones identified by the checkers.