review

Review research artifacts with scored verdicts and prioritized weaknesses.

1.6k|208|Updated Apr 9, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/skyllwt/AutoSci --skill review-skyllwt
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: review
Source: https://github.com/skyllwt/AutoSci/tree/main/.claude/skills/review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/skyllwt/AutoSci --skill review-skyllwt

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

It eliminates subjective, one-shot feedback on research artifacts by producing structured scores, prioritized weaknesses, and improvement suggestions grounded in an independent reviewer process.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Cross-model review output: Generates an Overall Score (1–10), strengths, ranked weaknesses with fixes, questions, and a clear verdict (ready/needs-work/major-revision/rethink).
  • Artifact-agnostic review: Reviews ideas, experiment plans, methods, paper drafts, and proposals from a wiki slug, a file path, or pasted free text.
  • Difficulty and focus controls: Supports standard, hard, and adversarial modes, plus focus on method, evidence, writing, or completeness.

Quick Start

Use the review skill to review a wiki idea called 'sparse-lora-for-edge-devices' with standard difficulty and comprehensive focus.

Frequently Asked Questions about review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I get structured feedback on a research paper draft?

To get structured feedback on a research paper draft, you can use an automated review process that generates an overall score, ranks weaknesses, and provides actionable fixes. It evaluates pasted text, file paths, or wiki references.

What is adversarial review for research methods?

Adversarial review for research methods is a rigorous evaluation mode that critically tests ideas, experiments, and evidence to identify deep structural weaknesses. It returns a scored verdict and prioritized questions.

Can I review a research artifact from a file path or wiki slug?

Yes, you can review a research artifact from a file path or wiki slug. The review process reads relevant wiki context and maps entities to validate evidence and assess methods across ideas, proposals, and drafts.

How do I evaluate evidence and method soundness in an experiment plan?

To evaluate evidence and method soundness in an experiment plan, apply a structured review workflow with a focus on method and evidence. It generates a scored verdict, highlights strengths, and lists improvements.

What is the best way to validate a free-text research proposal?

The best way to validate a free-text research proposal is through an independent reviewer process that applies structured scoring and wiki entity mapping. It outputs a clear verdict with ranked weaknesses and actionable fixes.