skills.rest
MediSolveAIDev
MediSolveAIDevOFFICIAL
Explore all skills by this author →
GitHub

review-tc

Compare TC JSON against scenario and policy documents to identify coverage gaps.

Updated Feb 11, 2026
Search Tags:#documentation#qa#coverage#test-case#tc-review#scenario-review
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/MediSolveAIDev/QA-MEDI-PLUGIN --skill review-tc
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: review-tc
Source: https://github.com/MediSolveAIDev/QA-MEDI-PLUGIN/tree/main/.claude/skills/review-tc
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/MediSolveAIDev/QA-MEDI-PLUGIN --skill review-tc

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Automates rigorous QA review by comparing TC JSON against scenario and policy documents to identify coverage gaps, inconsistencies, and improvement opportunities.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Cross-document validation: TC vs scenario vs policy.
  • Gap detection and actionable improvement suggestions.
  • 1:1 mapping checks between scenario items and TC entries.

Quick Start

Review TC JSON against the latest scenario and policy documents to generate a gap report.

Frequently Asked Questions about review-tc

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I check test case coverage against scenario and policy documents?▼

TC JSON requires scenario and policy documents as input to perform cross-document validation and generate a gap report. Providing these source documents ensures accurate 1:1 mapping checks between scenario items and TC entries.

Can I automate QA review to find missing test cases?▼

Improvement suggestions are generated by comparing TC JSON against original scenario and policy documents to detect coverage gaps, inconsistencies, and ambiguities. These recommendations include traceable references to the source documents for actionable follow-up.

Does test case review work with JSON format only?▼

TC JSON is compared against scenario and policy documents to identify coverage gaps, inconsistencies, and ambiguity issues. The review produces actionable recommendations with traceable references to the source documents for every missing case.

What is the best way to validate TC entries against original scenarios?▼

The best way to validate TC entries is through rigorous 1:1 mapping checks that compare TC JSON against the original scenario and policy documents. This ensures every scenario item has a corresponding TC entry and that all policy stipulations are fully reflected.

How do I generate actionable recommendations for missing test cases?▼

Actionable recommendations for missing test cases are generated by comparing TC JSON against scenario and policy documents to identify gaps and inconsistencies. These recommendations include traceable references to the source documents for clear follow-up actions.

Related Skills

Explore More Content & Communication Skills→
MediSolveAIDevMediSolveAIDev

write-tc

Convert narrative scenarios into structured test-case JSON files.

Official
Advanced
deanpetersdeanpeters
6.4k

user-story-mapping-workshop

Facilitate structured workshops to map user stories into release plans.

Community
Basic
MediSolveAIDevMediSolveAIDev

review-qa

Identify missing edge cases and feasibility gaps in QA scenario and test case reviews.

Official
Advanced
VirtoCommerceVirtoCommerce
2

qa-plan

Generate structured end-to-end test plans from scenario catalogs and feature requirements.

Official
Advanced