What problem does it solve? UX specifications often contain vague layouts, silently overridden design standards, or broken citations that only surface as bugs after implementation. This Skill provides an independent, clean-context review of a UX spec before anyone builds from it, catching blocking issues while they are still cheap to fix. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Citation Verification: Checks every claim the spec makes about the art bible, ADRs, and other cited documents against the actual source content, flagging silent redefinitions of project standards as blocking findings. - Template Conformance: Validates the spec against the ux-spec-template checklist, ensuring mandatory sections, filled metadata headers, and no leftover placeholders. - Implementability Audit: Verifies states cover empty and error cases, every entry point has an exit, state-changing actions appear in the request table, and acceptance criteria are binary. - Use Case: After write-ux-spec drafts or revises a screen specification, this Skill runs as a subagent each iteration, returning a verdict of Approved or Returned for Rework with severity-ranked findings. ## Quick Start Ask the assistant to review the UX spec at a given path against the project art bible and return a verdict with findings by severity.
