skills.rest
zniihgnexy
zniihgnexyCOMMUNITY
Explore all skills by this author →
GitHub

review

Audits paper drafts skeptically and produces review reports, revision logs, and experiment TODO lists.

Updated Apr 1, 2026
Search Tags:#experiment planning#academic writing#peer review#paper review#manuscript audit#revision plan
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/zniihgnexy/vid_tokenizer --skill review-zniihgnexy
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: review
Source: https://github.com/zniihgnexy/vid_tokenizer/tree/main/.ds/codex-home/skills/deepscientist-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/zniihgnexy/vid_tokenizer --skill review-zniihgnexy

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve? Drafts that look polished are not necessarily defensible; this Skill performs an independent, evidence-grounded audit of a substantial paper or report before finalization, rebuttal, or revision routing. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Skeptical audit: Identifies core claims, likely rejection reasons, and weaknesses across novelty, rigor, evidence sufficiency, and claim scope. - Durable artifacts: Writes review.md, revision_log.md, and experiment_todo.md under paper/review/ using structured templates. - Follow-up routing: Routes the next step to writing, literature scouting, baseline recovery, or supplementary experiments based on the audit outcome. - Use Case: A researcher has a near-final draft and asks for a harsh review; the Skill audits the claims, produces a revision plan with copy-ready replacement text, and lists only the experiments that are truly needed. ## Quick Start Ask the assistant to run a skeptical review of the current paper draft and produce a review report with a prioritized revision plan.

Frequently Asked Questions about review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I get a harsh review of my paper draft before submission?▼

Provide the draft and supporting experiment results, then request a skeptical audit. The Skill identifies core claims, top rejection reasons, and writes a review report with a prioritized revision plan under paper/review/.

What is the difference between review and rebuttal for papers?▼

Review audits a draft independently before external feedback exists, while rebuttal responds to concrete reviewer comments that already exist. Use review as a pre-submission gate and rebuttal after receiving external reviews.

When should I not use a paper review skill?▼

Do not use it when no meaningful draft exists yet, when the task is ordinary drafting from evidence, or when external reviewer comments already require a rebuttal response instead of an independent audit.

Does the review skill decide whether more experiments are needed?▼

Yes, it checks structured evaluation summaries first and only recommends experiments when evidence is genuinely insufficient. It produces a concrete experiment TODO list and a paper experiment matrix rather than vague ablation requests.

Can the review skill handle LaTeX manuscripts?▼

Yes, when manuscript_edit_mode is latex_required it edits the actual LaTeX sources if available, or provides LaTeX-ready replacement blocks with explicit insertion targets while preserving labels, citations, and section structure.

Related Skills

Explore More Education & Research Skills→
OpenLAIROpenLAIR
1.1k

ds-write

Drafts evidence-grounded research papers and reports with LaTeX venue templates and citation integrity checks.

Official
Advanced
OpenLAIROpenLAIR
1.1k

ds-review

Audits research paper drafts and produces skeptical review reports, revision logs, and experiment TODO lists.

Official
Advanced
tqLi99tqLi99
1

novelty-check

Identify core novelty aspects of research ideas against recent literature.

Community
Advanced
wanshuiyinwanshuiyin
15.6k

rebuttal

Drafts venue-compliant, evidence-grounded rebuttals responding to external peer reviews.

Community
Advanced