revision-confirm

You can verify plan revisions by independently analyzing the revision notes to evaluate consistency and surface discrepancies. This ensures alignment before you proceed to finalize the workflow.

Independent analysis for plan-agent revisions is needed to prevent misaligned execution. By evaluating the revision notes separately, you surface hidden risks and ensure the updated plan aligns with objectives before finalization.

Yes, you can trace the rationale of a plan revision confirmation. The analysis process logs the evaluation details, keeping a record of the rationale for audit and rollback purposes before guiding the finalization.

The best way to check for discrepancies in draft plan revisions is to perform an independent evaluation of the notes. This process identifies risks, enforces boundaries, and provides clear guidance on whether to finalize or request further changes.

Yes, the plan revision analysis stops after issuing guidance. It evaluates consistency, enforces boundaries, logs the analysis trace, and then halts operations after guiding the user to proceed to plan-finalize or request further revision.