risk-of-bias

Evaluate risk of bias across studies using RoB 2.0, ROBINS-I, NOS, QUADAS-2, and QUIPS.

Updated Nov 16, 2025
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/shaitamam-80/shaitamamMedAIHub --skill risk-of-bias-shaitamam-80
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: risk-of-bias
Source: https://github.com/shaitamam-80/shaitamamMedAIHub/tree/main/backend/app/core/skills/risk-of-bias
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/shaitamam-80/shaitamamMedAIHub --skill risk-of-bias-shaitamam-80

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill provides a structured approach to evaluating internal validity in systematic reviews by applying recognized bias tools (RoB 2.0, ROBINS-I, NOS, QUADAS-2, QUIPS). It helps researchers generate domain-specific judgments with explicit justifications, ensuring consistency across studies and outcomes.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • RoB 2.0, ROBINS-I, NOS, JBI, QUADAS-2, QUIPS: domain-based risk of bias assessments
  • Per-outcome domain judgments with supporting citations
  • Automated traffic-light plots and summary tables for publication-ready results
  • Clear distinction between "not reported" and "high risk" across study designs
  • Supports PRISMA-style reporting and exportable RoB artifacts

Quick Start

Load the study reports, select the bias tools, and run per-outcome domain assessments. The tool outputs domain judgments with evidence and exports per-study RoB artifacts for reporting.

Frequently Asked Questions about risk-of-bias

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I perform a risk of bias assessment for a systematic review?

To perform a risk of bias assessment, load study reports, select a recognized tool like RoB 2.0 or ROBINS-I, and run per-outcome domain evaluations to generate evidence-backed judgments and publication-ready plots.

What is per-outcome domain evaluation in risk of bias tools?

Per-outcome domain evaluation assesses internal validity individually for each study outcome. This structured approach yields domain-specific judgments with explicit justifications, ensuring assessment consistency across included studies.

Can I use ROBINS-I and QUADAS-2 for different study designs in the same review?

Yes, you can apply ROBINS-I and QUADAS-2 for different designs. The tool supports multiple frameworks simultaneously while maintaining a clear distinction between 'not reported' and 'high risk' across varied study designs.

How do I generate traffic-light plots for RoB 2.0 assessments?

Generate traffic-light plots by running per-outcome domain assessments with RoB 2.0. The tool automatically creates publication-ready summary tables and visual artifacts for transparent PRISMA-style reporting.

What is the best way to justify risk of bias judgments for PRISMA reporting?

The best way to justify risk of bias judgments is using evidence-backed per-domain assessments. The tool outputs explicit justification text with supporting citations and ready-to-publish artifacts for PRISMA reporting.

What should I do when a risk of bias domain is not reported in a study?

When a risk of bias domain is not reported, the tool explicitly distinguishes it from 'high risk' judgments. This ensures transparent per-outcome domain assessments without misclassifying missing information as definitive bias.