sanctions-screening-qa

Automates quality review of sanctions screening programs against regulatory frameworks.

Updated May 9, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/anotb/second-line-financial-services --skill sanctions-screening-qa
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: sanctions-screening-qa
Source: https://github.com/anotb/second-line-financial-services/tree/main/plugins/capability-plugins/financial-crime-governance/skills/sanctions-screening-qa
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/anotb/second-line-financial-services --skill sanctions-screening-qa

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill requires jsonschema, and includes scripts (resource) and references (resource) and assets (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill automates the quality review of sanctions screening programs against regulatory frameworks, reducing manual effort and improving accuracy in regulatory compliance.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Automated QA Review: Automates the review of sanctions screening programs against regulatory frameworks like the OFAC Framework and FFIEC OFAC section.
  • Data Extraction: Extracts data from alerts and program documentation for analysis.
  • Use Case: For a regional bank conducting a list-event review following a significant new SDN designation, this Skill can automate the review of customer-base full re-scans, payment-rail re-scans, and cross-rail consistency checks.

Quick Start

Use the sanctions-screening-qa skill to review the sanctions screening program against the OFAC Framework and FFIEC OFAC section for the specified review window.

Frequently Asked Questions about sanctions-screening-qa

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate sanctions screening QA review against the OFAC Framework?

Automate sanctions screening QA review by parsing regulatory frameworks, alert data, and program documentation to evaluate compliance against the OFAC Framework and FFIEC OFAC section. This reduces manual effort and improves accuracy for risk and compliance teams.

What is the best way to conduct a list-event review after a new SDN designation?

Conduct a list-event review by automating the quality review of customer-base full re-scans, payment-rail re-scans, and cross-rail consistency checks. This ensures your sanctions screening program remains compliant following significant new SDN designations.

Does sanctions screening QA require jsonschema for validation?

Yes, sanctions screening QA requires the jsonschema dependency to validate structured data outputs. This ensures the extracted alert data and program documentation meet the required structured formats for accurate automated compliance analysis.

Can I use this approach for exam readiness and pre-validation reviews?

Yes, you can use this automated QA review approach for exam readiness reviews, pre-validation reviews, and targeted reviews after list-update events. It parses regulatory frameworks and alert data to prepare risk and compliance teams for regulatory examinations.

What types of sanctions screening data can be extracted for compliance analysis?

The QA review process extracts data from alerts and program documentation for analysis. By parsing this data alongside regulatory frameworks like the FFIEC OFAC section, it automates the quality review of your sanctions screening program.

When should I not use automated QA review for sanctions screening?

Automated QA review is designed for periodic sample QA, pre-validation reviews, exam readiness, and targeted reviews after list-update events. It may not suit ad-hoc queries or scenarios lacking structured alert data and program documentation for parsing.