skills.rest
brainworkup
brainworkupCOMMUNITY
Explore all skills by this author →
Website𝕏@brainworkupGitHub

scholar-evaluation

Evaluate scholarly work across research quality dimensions using the ScholarEval framework.

1|Updated Apr 8, 2026
Search Tags:#evaluation#reporting#scoring#peer-review#literature-review#dimension#scholareval
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/brainworkup/skills --skill scholar-evaluation-brainworkup
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: scholar-evaluation
Source: https://github.com/brainworkup/skills/tree/main/neuropsych-reports/references/luria-related-complement-skills/scholar-evaluation
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/brainworkup/skills --skill scholar-evaluation-brainworkup

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes scripts (resource) and references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

Systematically evaluate scholarly work using the ScholarEval framework, providing structured assessment across research quality dimensions including problem formulation, literature review, methodology, data, analysis, writing, and overall publication readiness, with quantitative scoring and actionable feedback.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Framework-based, dimension-driven evaluation of papers, proposals, literature reviews, theses, and conference abstracts.
  • Generates explicit scores for each dimension, a weighted overall score, and an actionable feedback summary, plus guidance for revision and publication readiness.
  • Integrates with the scholarly workflow by optionally exporting reports and injecting diagrams or schematics as needed.

Quick Start

Provide rigorous, structured evaluation prompts to load references, score dimensions, and generate a comprehensive evaluator report.

Frequently Asked Questions about scholar-evaluation

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I systematically evaluate a research paper across multiple dimensions?▼

To systematically evaluate a research paper, you can use a framework-based approach that scores dimensions like problem formulation, methodology, and data analysis on a 1-5 scale to generate actionable feedback.

Can I score a thesis or conference abstract using a structured peer-review framework?▼

Yes, structured peer-review frameworks can be applied to assess theses and conference abstracts, providing weighted overall scores and revision guidance to improve publication readiness.

What is the best way to generate a quantitative literature review report?▼

Generating a quantitative literature review report involves scoring evaluation dimensions such as problem formulation, citations, and writing quality, then exporting a detailed breakdown with actionable feedback.

How do I apply weighting to dimension scores during scholarly evaluation?▼

During scholarly evaluation, you can apply optional weighting to dimension scores across criteria like methodology and analysis, which calculates a weighted overall score for the research work.

Does the ScholarEval framework support exporting evaluation breakdowns and visualizations?▼

The ScholarEval framework supports exporting detailed evaluation breakdowns and optionally injects diagrams or schematics, delivering a consumable report with scores and publication readiness guidance.

Related Skills

Explore More Education & Research Skills→
WanLanglinWanLanglin

scholar-evaluation

Evaluate scholarly work with dimension scores using the ScholarEval framework.

Community
Advanced
HolobiomicsLabHolobiomicsLab
4

scholar-evaluation

Evaluates scholarly works with structured criteria and weighted scoring.

Official
Advanced
unerueunerue

Scholar Evaluation

Evaluate scholarly work across quality dimensions with scoring and feedback.

Community
Advanced
lhohanlhohan
2

skill-evaluator

Evaluate Claude Code skills across eight dimensions and generate improvement reports.

Community
Basic