skills.rest
HolobiomicsLab
HolobiomicsLabOFFICIAL
Explore all skills by this author →
WebsiteGitHub

scholar-evaluation

Evaluates scholarly works with structured criteria and weighted scoring.

4|1|Updated Jun 18, 2025
Search Tags:#evaluation#rubrics#peer-review#academic-writing#research-quality#scholareval
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/HolobiomicsLab/Toolomics --skill scholar-evaluation-holobiomicslab
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: scholar-evaluation
Source: https://github.com/HolobiomicsLab/Toolomics/tree/main/mcp_host/skills/scientific-skills/scientific-skills/scholar-evaluation
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/HolobiomicsLab/Toolomics --skill scholar-evaluation-holobiomicslab

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes scripts (resource) and references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

Provides a standardized, objective framework to assess scholarly work across key dimensions and generate actionable feedback and quantitative scores.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Systematic evaluation across eight ScholarEval dimensions using a weighted rubric to produce objective scores.
  • Comprehensive feedback and guidance aimed at improving methodology, writing, and publication readiness.
  • Reporting and traceability: outputs a detailed score breakdown and prioritized recommendations for revision and decision-making.

Quick Start

Apply ScholarEval to a scholarly document to obtain a structured evaluation report and actionable feedback.

Frequently Asked Questions about scholar-evaluation

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I evaluate a research paper using a structured rubric?▼

You can evaluate a research paper by applying a structured rubric across eight dimensions, including problem formulation, methodology, and data analysis, to generate objective 5-point weighted scores and actionable revision feedback.

What is the best way to assess publication readiness for an academic manuscript?▼

Assessing publication readiness involves scoring academic manuscripts across writing quality, methodology, and citations to produce a summarized report with prioritized recommendations for revision and decision-making.

Can I use a peer-review framework to evaluate research proposals and literature reviews?▼

Yes, this scholarly evaluation framework applies across research papers, proposals, literature reviews, and academic manuscripts to guide review and revision using standardized weighted criteria.

How does weighted scoring work for academic writing evaluation?▼

Weighted scoring for academic writing evaluation assigns a 5-point scale across eight defined dimensions like problem formulation, data collection, and citations, calculating objective dimension scores that output a detailed breakdown.

Does scholarly evaluation require specific formatting or dependencies to analyze research quality?▼

No specific dependencies are required to analyze research quality; you simply apply the structured evaluation criteria to your scholarly document to obtain a comprehensive score report and traceable recommendations.

Related Skills

Explore More Education & Research Skills→
Imad-OuteImad-Oute

scholar-evaluation

Evaluate scholarly works using a structured rubric across multiple quality dimensions.

Community
Advanced
GongXLiangGongXLiang

scholar-evaluation

Evaluate scholarly work using the ScholarEval eight-dimension rubric and generate a structured feedback report.

Community
Advanced
haomingzhaomingz
12

paper-review-coach

Perform structured peer-review of academic manuscripts across originality, methodology, results, and writing.

Community
Advanced
daffy0208daffy0208
34

quality-auditor

Audit tools and codebases across 12 quality dimensions with evidence and scores.

Community
Advanced