What problem does it solve? Assessing research papers, proposals, and literature reviews consistently is difficult without a structured rubric, leading to vague or biased feedback. This Skill applies the ScholarEval framework to produce systematic, dimension-by-dimension evaluations with quantitative scores and actionable recommendations. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Eight-Dimension Assessment: Evaluates problem formulation, literature review, methodology, data collection, analysis, results, writing, and citations against detailed rubrics. - Quantitative Scoring: Calculates weighted aggregate scores on a 5-point scale with quality-level classification via the included Python script. - Actionable Feedback: Generates prioritized, evidence-based recommendations and publication-readiness assessments tailored to work stage, venue, and discipline. - Use Case: A researcher submits a draft machine learning paper and receives a structured report scoring each dimension, identifying that methodology is strong but the literature review lacks recent sources, with ranked revision priorities. ## Quick Start Evaluate this research paper using the ScholarEval framework and produce a scored report with prioritized feedback.
