skills.rest
HaipingXu
HaipingXuCOMMUNITY
Explore all skills by this author →
GitHub

academic-paper-reviewer

Simulate a multi-perspective academic paper review with five specialized agents.

21|4|Updated Mar 14, 2026
Search Tags:#academic review#devil's advocate#peer review#manuscript critique#research paper feedback#editorial decision
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/HaipingXu/social-science-claude-scholar --skill academic-paper-reviewer
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: academic-paper-reviewer
Source: https://github.com/HaipingXu/social-science-claude-scholar/tree/main/skills/academic-paper-reviewer
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/HaipingXu/social-science-claude-scholar --skill academic-paper-reviewer

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes scripts (resource) and references (resource) and agents (resource) and templates (resource) and examples (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill simulates a rigorous academic peer review process, providing comprehensive feedback on your manuscript from multiple expert perspectives to identify weaknesses and improve submission readiness.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Multi-Perspective Review: Simulates 5 distinct reviewer personas (EIC, 3 peer reviewers, Devil's Advocate) with field-specific expertise.
  • Comprehensive Feedback: Generates detailed review reports, an editorial decision, and a prioritized revision roadmap.
  • Use Case: Before submitting your research paper to a top journal, use this Skill to get a simulated peer review that covers methodology, domain expertise, cross-disciplinary insights, and critical challenges, helping you refine your arguments and strengthen your manuscript.

Quick Start

Review this paper by pasting its content or providing a file path.

Frequently Asked Questions about academic-paper-reviewer

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I get peer review feedback on my research paper before submission?▼

A multi-perspective peer review analyzes your manuscript through 5 specialized agents, including an Editor-in-Chief and a Devil's Advocate. It provides comprehensive feedback covering methodology, domain expertise, cross-disciplinary viewpoints, and core argument challenges to strengthen your submission.

Can I get a quick manuscript critique instead of a full academic review?▼

Yes, you can get a quick manuscript critique. The system supports a quick assessment mode alongside full review, re-review, and guided modes, allowing you to rapidly evaluate your research paper and identify critical weaknesses before proceeding to deeper critique.

How does the devil's advocate review challenge my manuscript arguments?▼

During a simulated peer review, the system dynamically generates 5 field-specific reviewer personas based on your paper's discipline and methodology. This tailored approach ensures the critique spans domain expertise and cross-disciplinary viewpoints relevant to your specific research context.

What is the best way to prepare a manuscript for top journal submission?▼

The system generates a prioritized revision roadmap alongside detailed review reports and an editorial decision. This structured output guides manuscript improvement by highlighting critical weaknesses identified across methodology, domain expertise, and cross-disciplinary viewpoints during the critique process.

Related Skills

Explore More Education & Research Skills→
IranbIranb

academic-paper-reviewer

Automate academic paper peer review with simulated reviewer personas.

Community
Advanced
Ricardo-VaeRicardo-Vae

academic-paper-reviewer

Generate structured journal-style peer reviews and editorial decisions for academic manuscripts.

Community
Advanced
AvaivartikaAvaivartika
1

paper-reviewer

Generate six-section peer reviews with evidence anchors for academic manuscripts.

Community
Advanced
GPTtangGPTtang
4

academic-paper-reviewer

Simulate multi-perspective academic paper reviews with structured feedback.

Community
Advanced