scientific-doe

Plan and optimize multi-factor experiments using DOE templates.

3|1|Updated Feb 11, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/nahisaho/satori --skill scientific-doe
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: scientific-doe
Source: https://github.com/nahisaho/satori/tree/main/src/.github/skills/scientific-doe
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/nahisaho/satori --skill scientific-doe

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Experimental design is often resource-intensive and requires rigorous planning to identify influential factors efficiently.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • DOE provides orthogonal arrays, central composite designs (CCD), Box-Behnken designs, D-optimal designs, and response surface templates to streamline experimentation.
  • Use cases include factor screening, optimization, and quantitative process understanding across chemistry, biology, and materials science.

Quick Start

Define factors and levels, run an initial screening with orthogonal arrays, and then refine the design using CCD or RSM templates.

Frequently Asked Questions about scientific-doe

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I plan multi-factor experiments using design of experiments templates?

Plan multi-factor experiments by defining factors and levels, running initial screening with orthogonal arrays, then refining the design using central composite or response surface templates.

What is the difference between orthogonal arrays and central composite designs for factor screening?

Orthogonal arrays are used for initial factor screening to identify influential variables, while central composite designs are applied afterward to refine the design and optimize the response surface.

Can I use Box-Behnken and D-optimal designs for process optimization in chemistry and biology?

Yes, Box-Behnken and D-optimal designs are supported for process optimization and quantitative understanding across research domains including chemistry, biology, and materials science.

When should I use response surface methods instead of factorial design?

Use factorial design for initial screening to identify influential factors, then apply response surface methods when you need to refine the design and optimize the quantitative process.

What's the best way to set up a design of experiments workflow for resource-intensive research?

Start by defining factors and levels, run an initial screening with orthogonal arrays to efficiently identify influential factors, then refine the design using response surface templates.