Scientific Paper Reviewer Skill (Multi-Venue)

Route and execute dual-venue peer review workflows for NeurIPS and IEEE papers.

3|1|Updated Nov 5, 2025
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/astoreyai/claude-skills --skill scientific-paper-reviewer-skill-multi-venue
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: Scientific Paper Reviewer Skill (Multi-Venue)
Source: https://github.com/astoreyai/claude-skills/tree/main/skills/review/paper-reviewer
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/astoreyai/claude-skills --skill scientific-paper-reviewer-skill-multi-venue

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

The Skill provides a unified, multi-venue peer-review workflow that guides editors, program chairs, and reviewers through venue detection, pathway-specific assessments, and standardized synthesis for NeurIPS and IEEE submissions.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Dual-pathway evaluation for NeurIPS (conference) and IEEE (journal/transactions) submissions.
  • Shared component library for venue detection, ethics screening, and paper classification.
  • Structured review synthesis templates tailored to each venue.
  • Clear decision frameworks and best practices to ensure consistent, rigorous reviews.
  • Use Case: Editors route incoming manuscripts to the appropriate pathway and generate a complete review package.

Quick Start

Follow the SKILL orchestrator to start with venue detection, then select the NeurIPS or IEEE pathway, and use components in order to complete a structured review.

Frequently Asked Questions about Scientific Paper Reviewer Skill (Multi-Venue)

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate peer review workflows for NeurIPS and IEEE submissions?

Automate peer review workflows by using an orchestrator that detects the venue and applies pathway-specific evaluations, ethics checks, and structured synthesis for NeurIPS and IEEE submissions. It guides reviewers through standardized steps to generate a complete review package.

What is the best way to standardize peer-review evaluations across different conferences and journals?

Standardize peer-review evaluations by applying a shared component library for venue detection, ethics screening, and paper classification, followed by venue-specific structured review templates tailored for NeurIPS and IEEE to ensure consistent synthesis.

How does venue detection work for multi-venue manuscript routing?

Venue detection for multi-venue manuscript routing works by identifying whether a submission targets NeurIPS or IEEE, automatically routing the paper to the correct evaluation pathway to apply the appropriate peer-review checks and templates.

Can I use one peer-review system for both NeurIPS conference and IEEE journal papers?

Yes, you can use one peer-review system for both NeurIPS conference and IEEE journal papers. The dual-pathway evaluation supports both venues, applying modular venue-specific assessments and shared ethics checks for comprehensive editor decisions.

What steps are needed to generate a structured peer-review package for an editor decision?

Generate a structured peer-review package by following the orchestrator to detect the venue, select the correct NeurIPS or IEEE pathway, execute ethics screening and paper classification, and synthesize the final structured review using venue-specific templates.

Are there limitations to using automated peer-review workflows for academic submissions?

Limitations of automated peer-review workflows include their restriction to supported venues like NeurIPS and IEEE; manuscripts outside these pathways require alternative evaluation frameworks, and the process relies on standardized templates that may not capture highly unconventional formats.