second-opinion

Analyze design documents across Strategist, Researcher, Executor, and Critic roles.

29|4|Updated Apr 5, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/S0ulFood/second-opinion --skill second-opinion-s0ulfood
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: second-opinion
Source: https://github.com/S0ulFood/second-opinion/tree/main
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/S0ulFood/second-opinion --skill second-opinion-s0ulfood

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes scripts (resource) and references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill provides a second opinion on design work, helping you ensure that your design solutions are solving the right problem and are of high quality.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Four Distinct Roles: Strategist, Researcher, Executor, and Critic, each offering a unique perspective on the design process.
  • Iterative Workflows: Facilitates iterative design by enabling AI to review and refine design documents.
  • Design Cognition Documents: Utilizes a shared epistemic foundation and role-specific guidelines to guide the design process.
  • Use Case: When you are working on a design project and want to validate your approach, get feedback on your designs, or need assistance in refining your design strategy.

Quick Start

Use the second-opinion skill to get a second opinion on your design document.

Frequently Asked Questions about second-opinion

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I get a second opinion on my design work to validate my approach?

To get a second opinion on your design work, you can use this AI-driven design thinking partner to analyze your design documents. It evaluates your approach across four distinct roles: Strategist, Researcher, Executor, and Critic, ensuring your design solves the right problem and maintains high quality.

What is design validation and how does an AI critique improve design documents?

Design validation is the process of evaluating design documents to ensure they solve the right problem effectively. An AI critique improves design documents by analyzing them through Strategist, Researcher, Executor, and Critic perspectives, offering insights that refine strategy and enhance overall design quality.

How do I use design thinking to refine my design strategy and iterate on concepts?

You can use design thinking to refine your strategy by submitting design documents for AI analysis. The tool evaluates your work across four roles, providing structured feedback that facilitates iterative design workflows and helps you validate your approach.

Can I use this design critique tool for validating iterative design workflows?

Yes, you can use this design critique tool for iterative design workflows. It facilitates iterative refinement by enabling the AI to review and evaluate your design documents repeatedly, ensuring your design process consistently solves the right problem at a high quality.

What's the best way to evaluate design cognition and ensure my design solves the right problem?

The best way to evaluate design cognition is to analyze your design documents using a multi-role framework. By applying Strategist, Researcher, Executor, and Critic perspectives, you validate that your design solves the correct problem while maintaining high structural quality.

Do I need a completed design document to get AI feedback on my design process?

Yes, you need a design document to analyze. The tool requires an existing design document to provide feedback, evaluate your design process, and offer insights from its four distinct roles on your strategy and execution quality.