skill-checker

To evaluate skill quality, you need a standardized 100-point assessment that analyzes frontmatter, structure, and documentation consistency, then generates actionable remediation tasks for improvement.

A skill metadata quality check covers frontmatter validation, file structure analysis, and documentation consistency to diagnose issues across the skill file and output a structured scoring rubric.

You need a 100-point evaluation after creating a new skill or during maintenance of an existing one to identify documentation gaps and receive structured improvement tasks for the next update cycle.

Yes, the skill-checker works for both new skill creation and existing skill maintenance, applying a standardized rubric to evaluate frontmatter, structure, and documentation integrity regardless of the skill's current state.

No, the skill quality evaluation operates with zero dependencies, analyzing skill files, frontmatter, and documentation structure directly to produce scoring and optional remediation tasks without external components.

The best way to diagnose frontmatter and structure issues is applying a standardized 100-point evaluation that cross-checks documentation consistency and outputs actionable improvement tasks for identified problems.