skill-debate

Coordinate multi-agent AI debates with structured rounds and synthesized reports.

28|3|Updated May 10, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/CES-Ltd/Lumi --skill skill-debate-ces-ltd
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: skill-debate
Source: https://github.com/CES-Ltd/Lumi/tree/main/resources/seed/octopus/skills/skill-debate
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/CES-Ltd/Lumi --skill skill-debate-ces-ltd

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes scripts (resource) and references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill enables users to conduct structured, multi-agent AI debates to explore different viewpoints on complex topics, fostering comprehensive understanding and informed decision-making.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Multi-Agent Debates: Coordinates four AI participants—including external CLI tools and internal models—to debate topics from diverse perspectives.
  • Structured Rounds: Supports multiple rounds with customizable styles, ensuring deep analysis and critique.
  • Synthesis & Reporting: Combines all perspectives into a detailed final report, highlighting agreed points, disagreements, and recommendations.
  • Use Case: Ideal for technical reviews, strategic planning, and critical assessments where multiple viewpoints are essential.

Quick Start

Invoke /debate https://example.com and specify topic to start a multi-round, multi-perspective AI debate directly through your command interface.

Frequently Asked Questions about skill-debate

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I conduct a multi-agent AI debate to analyze complex topics?

To conduct a multi-agent AI debate, you invoke the debate command with a target topic or URL to coordinate multiple AI participants across structured rounds, generating a synthesized report of diverse perspectives.

What is multi-perspective AI synthesis and how does it work?

Multi-perspective AI synthesis works by coordinating four AI agents to debate a topic from diverse viewpoints across multiple rounds, critiquing opinions and combining agreed points and disagreements into a comprehensive final summary.

Can I use external CLI tools alongside internal models for AI debate rounds?

Yes, you can integrate external CLI tools and internal models as AI debate participants, allowing them to interact through structured rounds to ensure deep analysis and comprehensive opinion critique.

Does multi-agent debate support customizable discussion styles for strategic planning?

Multi-agent debate supports customizable styles across multiple rounds, making it suitable for strategic planning, technical reviews, and critical assessments where diverse viewpoints and structured interactions are essential.

How do I get a synthesized summary after a multi-perspective AI debate?

After a multi-perspective AI debate concludes, the system automatically generates a detailed final report that combines all viewpoints, highlighting agreed points, disagreements, and actionable recommendations for professional presentation.

What are the limitations of using AI debate for technical reviews?

AI debate for technical reviews relies on the reasoning capabilities of integrated external CLI tools and internal models, meaning output quality depends on participant model performance and the specificity of the input topic.