skill-design-principles

Enforce design principles for SKILL creation and review with scoped guidance.

Updated Aug 27, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/sage-base/sagebase --skill skill-design-principles
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: skill-design-principles
Source: https://github.com/sage-base/sagebase/tree/main/.claude/skills/skill-design-principles
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/sage-base/sagebase --skill skill-design-principles

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill provides a structured approach to creating high-quality SKILLs by distinguishing hard guardrails from soft guardrails, and by keeping SKILLs tightly scoped for practical usefulness.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Clear distinction between hard guardrails (CI/hook enforced) and soft guardrails (guidance that requires human judgment)
  • Scope control to ensure SKILLs stay task-specific and actionable
  • Practical guidance with concrete examples and review flow to improve existing SKILLs

Quick Start

  • Review existing SKILLs to ensure no hard guardrails are embedded in content
  • Define a narrow activation scope that targets a single task or domain
  • Provide concrete examples and a concise checklist to guide SKILL creation or evaluation

Frequently Asked Questions about skill-design-principles

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
What are design principles for creating high-quality skills with focused scope?

Design principles for creating high-quality skills require a narrow activation scope targeting a single task, actionable guidance, practical checklists, and concrete examples to ensure practical usefulness.

How do I distinguish hard guardrails from soft guardrails in skill design?

Hard guardrails in skill design are CI or hook-enforced constraints, while soft guardrails provide designed guidance that requires human judgment during skill creation and evaluation.

How do I review existing skills to ensure they have a narrow scope?

Review existing skills by checking that no hard guardrails are embedded in content, verifying the activation scope targets a single domain, and evaluating against a concise checklist for actionable guidance.

Why should hard guardrails be avoided within skill content?

Hard guardrails should be avoided within skill content because they belong as CI or hook-enforced constraints, while skill content should focus on soft guardrails and designed guidance requiring human judgment.

What do I need to define when creating a new skill with focused scope?

When creating a new skill, you need to define a narrow activation scope targeting a single task, provide concrete examples, and include a concise checklist to guide both creation and evaluation.

Can I use checklists to evaluate skill design principles during reviews?

Yes, you can use practical checklists to evaluate skill design principles during reviews, ensuring skills maintain task-specific scope, actionable guidance, and proper separation of soft and hard guardrails.