skill-judge

You evaluate skill quality by assessing units against an 8-dimensional scoring framework to produce structured evaluation reports. It analyzes frontmatter validity, description quality, and pattern adherence to generate dimension scores and improvement suggestions.

Skill frontmatter validation checks a skill's activation metadata against official reference guides to ensure compliance. It verifies frontmatter structure and description quality to confirm the skill has clear activation triggers and actionable guidance.

You audit existing skills by running the evaluation on a skill unit directory to generate a standardized report. It uses official references to benchmark compliance, outputting critical issues, strengths, and a formal evaluation summary suitable for deployment reviews.

No, this skill evaluation tool requires no external dependencies to assess skill quality. It operates self-contained using internal official reference guides to validate frontmatter and score dimensions without needing additional packages.

The best way to generate a structured QA report is to run this evaluation framework on a skill directory. It outputs formal evaluation summaries including dimension scores, critical issues, and improvement suggestions aligned with official benchmarking references.

You should avoid using an automated scoring framework when evaluating highly subjective or experimental skill designs that lack standardized frontmatter. The framework relies on strict pattern adherence and progressive disclosure triggers to benchmark quality accurately.